Skip to main content

Security report for agrosuper.com

Agrosuper · Manufacturing · Chile

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Agrosuper is a large Chilean food holding company specializing in the production and commercialization of meat and aquaculture products including chicken, pork, turkey, and salmon. The company operates domestically and exports to over 50 countries, positioning itself as a leading food manufacturer in Chile. The website reflects a professional brand presence with bilingual support and investor relations content. Technically, the site is built on WordPress and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, but lacks visible security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, which are areas for improvement. The absence of WHOIS data raises questions about domain registration transparency but does not detract from the apparent legitimacy of the business. Overall, the site is functional, professional, and moderately secure but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching agrosuper.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
65
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Agrosuper's market positioning as a major food producer in Chile with international reach is supported by its diversified product portfolio and clear segmentation into meat and aquaculture divisions. The presence of an integrated report and investor section signals transparency and engagement with stakeholders. The business model focuses on high-quality food production and global commercialization. The linked subsidiary domain for aquaculture indicates a structured corporate ecosystem. The company targets consumers, investors, and partners in the food industry. Growth indicators include international presence and ongoing reporting. Strategic partnerships and marketing tools are leveraged for brand visibility. The lack of explicit contact information on the landing page may limit direct customer engagement but aligns with a corporate-focused site.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid baseline security posture with enforced HTTPS and no exposed sensitive data. The use of modern analytics and marketing scripts is balanced with the absence of known vulnerable libraries. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could hinder timely security issue reporting. Privacy compliance is weak, with no visible privacy or cookie policies or consent mechanisms, potentially exposing the company to regulatory risks. The site does not provide contact channels for security incidents. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by adopting standard security headers, publishing policies, and establishing incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR and other privacy regulation compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general inquiries and security incident reporting to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain and improve website security posture and user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Agrosuper
Description
Agrosuper is a food holding company that produces and commercializes chicken, pork, turkey, salmon, and processed products with high quality standards. It operates in Chile and exports to more than 50 countries worldwide.
Key services
Production and commercialization of chicken, Production and commercialization of pork, Production and commercialization of turkey, Production and commercialization of salmon, Processed food products
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, WordPress 6.8.1, jQuery
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF blocking.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the landing page.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly provided on the landing page.
  4. Website uses multiple analytics and tracking scripts including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag.
  5. Website is built on WordPress CMS version 6.8.1.
  6. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information.
  7. No visible security headers detected in the provided data.
  8. The site is bilingual with English and Spanish language options.
  9. The WHOIS query returned no data, indicating possible privacy protection or recent domain registration.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1, utilizing standard web technologies including JavaScript libraries for analytics and marketing such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. The site loads multiple asynchronous scripts from trusted domains, indicating a modern approach to performance optimization. The CSS and HTML are valid and support responsive design, providing good mobile optimization. However, no advanced frameworks or hosting provider details are evident from the source. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in accessibility and SEO. The absence of security headers and privacy policies indicates technical debt in compliance and security best practices. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable but could benefit from modernization in security and privacy implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with agrosuper.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review agrosuper.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.