Skip to main content

Security report for agrolab.dk

Agrolab A/S · Other · Denmark

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Agrolab A/S is a well-established Contract Research Organization specializing in field research and regulatory consulting within the agricultural and food production sectors, primarily serving the EU North Zone including Scandinavia and the Baltic states. The company holds recognized certifications such as GEP and GLP, reinforcing its credibility and expertise in the industry. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, offering clear information about their services including drone imaging and research and development. Technically, the website is built on a modern WordPress platform utilizing popular plugins for SEO, marketing, and GDPR compliance. The infrastructure supports good performance and mobile optimization, with integration of major analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. The hosting provider appears to be UnoEuro, a known hosting service. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration and implements cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR. While some security headers are not explicitly detected, no critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. The WHOIS data confirms the legitimacy of the domain registration, consistent with the business information presented. Overall, Agrolab's digital presence is strong, with good content quality, technical implementation, and privacy compliance. The absence of a terms of service page and explicit security policy are minor gaps. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, maintaining up-to-date software, and adding incident response information to further strengthen trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching agrolab.dk

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
25
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
80
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Agrolab holds a strong market position as the recommended CRO in the EU North Zone, focusing on agricultural field research and regulatory consulting. Their business model revolves around providing specialized services to companies seeking product registration and compliance in the agricultural sector. The company targets businesses in Scandinavia and the Baltic region, leveraging certifications like GEP and GLP to differentiate themselves. Their partnership ecosystem includes active social media channels and marketing tools to engage clients. Growth indicators include recent news updates and expansion into drone imaging and startups support. The company maintains a medium size with a clear focus on quality and compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and GDPR-compliant cookie consent. Use of security and privacy plugins like Complianz GDPR indicates awareness of privacy regulations. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. There is no visible incident response or security policy page, which could enhance transparency and readiness. Overall, the security culture appears proactive but could benefit from formalized policies and additional technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Add a dedicated security policy and incident response information page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Ensure all WordPress core, themes, and plugins are regularly updated to minimize vulnerability exposure.
  4. Conduct periodic security audits and penetration testing to identify and remediate potential weaknesses.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Agrolab A/S
VAT number
DK30344820
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Agrolab A/S
Description
Agrolab A/S is the recommended research organization in the EU North Zone within field research and regulatory consulting. They provide consultation and field trial services to assist companies towards the registration of plant protection products in the agricultural and food production sector, specializing in Scandinavia and the Baltic states.
Key services
Field Research, Regulatory Consulting, Research and Development, Drone Imaging, Startups support
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, WPBakery Page Builder, Slider Revolution, jQuery, Mailchimp for WP, Complianz GDPR plugin, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Sleeknote
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security and privacy plugins (Complianz GDPR)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
Mailchimp, Sleeknote
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Compliant with GDPR and cookie consent regulations.
  3. Clear business focus on field research and regulatory consulting in agriculture.
  4. Use of modern marketing and analytics tools.
  5. No critical security issues detected.
  6. No terms of service page found.
  7. Contact information is clearly presented and verified.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including Yoast SEO, WPBakery Page Builder, and Slider Revolution. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Mailchimp, and Sleeknote for lead generation. Hosting appears to be provided by UnoEuro. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. The site uses valid meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. No broken elements or errors were detected. Technical risks are low but depend on maintaining updates and improving security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with agrolab.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review agrolab.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.