Skip to main content

Security report for agm-plc.co.uk

AGM Service · Other · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AGM Service is a UK-based company specializing in the specification, installation, commissioning, and maintenance of water boosting and pressurisation systems. Founded in 2023 and operating under the parent company Fluid Water Group, AGM positions itself as a reliable nationwide service provider with 24/7 availability. The company serves a diverse range of sectors including facilities management, government, healthcare, hospitality, and education. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, emphasizing their authorized partnerships with leading manufacturers. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern frameworks and includes comprehensive SEO and analytics integrations. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, bot management, and cookie consent mechanisms, though there is room for improvement in explicit security headers and incident response transparency. Overall, AGM Service presents a credible and trustworthy digital presence aligned with its business objectives.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching agm-plc.co.uk

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
83
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in a niche market focused on plant room and water system services, leveraging authorized partnerships to enhance credibility. Their business model centers on service delivery including installation, repairs, and maintenance, targeting institutional and commercial clients. The website's content and structure support lead generation and customer engagement, with clear calls to action and contact information. The presence of a parent company and partner logos indicates a solid partnership ecosystem. Growth potential is supported by a comprehensive service offering and nationwide coverage. The company maintains a professional online presence with active social media channels, enhancing market reach and brand visibility.

Security posture

AGM Service demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of Cloudflare Bot Management, and a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. The website does not expose sensitive data and uses reputable third-party analytics and marketing tools. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure mechanism represents a compliance gap. Security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options are not explicitly detected and should be implemented to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. Overall, the security measures are adequate for the business type but could be enhanced to improve resilience and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify security headers including X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible from the website to improve transparency and compliance.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve security posture.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance form security with CAPTCHA or other anti-bot measures to prevent automated abuse.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
AGM Service
Registration number
03426727
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AGM Service
Description
AGM delivers expert specification, installation, and commissioning of water boosting and pressurisation systems, tailored for long-term performance and efficiency. They provide nationwide installation, commissioning, servicing, and repairs with a focus on plant room equipment and water systems across the UK.
Key services
Installation and Commissioning, System Servicing and Repairs, Service Packages
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Bootstrap, TinySlider, SimpleLightbox, Max Mega Menu, CookieYes Consent, Hotjar, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Cloudflare Bot Management
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Cloudflare Bot Management

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Hotjar
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms are implemented.
  3. Clear and consistent branding with professional design and navigation.
  4. Contact information is prominently displayed and consistent across pages.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  6. No security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file found.
  8. Domain age matches business founding date, indicating a new but legitimate business.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using Bootstrap for responsive design and includes advanced SEO via Yoast. It integrates multiple third-party services such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel, and CookieYes for consent management. The site is hosted behind Cloudflare, leveraging its bot management capabilities. Performance is optimized with responsive images and asynchronous script loading. Accessibility and SEO best practices are well implemented. Technical debt appears low with up-to-date libraries and plugins. Opportunities exist to further harden security headers and improve incident response readiness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with agm-plc.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review agm-plc.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.