Skip to main content

Security report for agh.lv

Other

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'agh.lv' appears to represent a small business focused on providing medical, laboratory, and ergonomic school furniture. The site content is minimal, consisting mainly of two image links directing users to product categories. There is no metadata, structured data, or contact information available, which limits the ability to fully assess the business profile or market position. The target audience likely includes institutions or businesses seeking specialized furniture solutions. Technically, the website uses basic HTML and CSS without any detected CMS or advanced frameworks. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, and SEO features are minimal. Security posture is weak due to the absence of HTTPS, security headers, and privacy policies. No WHOIS data could be retrieved due to query limits, resulting in low confidence in domain legitimacy and registration details. Overall, the site is accessible but lacks critical security and compliance features, reducing trustworthiness and professional appearance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching agh.lv

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
15
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business appears to operate in the niche market of specialized furniture for medical and educational sectors. The business model seems to be e-commerce or informational, directing visitors to product categories. There is no evidence of partnerships, certifications, or extensive market presence. The lack of contact information and policies suggests a small or early-stage operation with limited digital maturity. Growth potential may be constrained by minimal online presence and lack of trust signals. No revenue streams or detailed business insights are available from the site content.

Security posture

The security maturity level is low. The absence of HTTPS and security headers exposes users to potential risks such as data interception and clickjacking. No privacy or cookie policies indicate non-compliance with GDPR or other data protection regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present. The site does not collect user data via forms, reducing some risk but also limiting engagement. Overall, the security posture requires significant improvement to meet basic standards and build user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user connections.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  3. Include clear contact information such as email and phone numbers to improve credibility.
  4. Enhance security by adding HTTP security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options.
  5. Improve website content quality, SEO, and accessibility to increase user engagement and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website appears to be related to furniture, specifically medical and laboratory furniture and ergonomic school furniture, as indicated by image alt texts and linked pages.
Key services
Medical and laboratory furniture, Ergonomic furniture for schools
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is minimal and primarily visual with two main links to furniture categories.
  2. No metadata such as Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data found.
  3. No forms or data collection mechanisms detected.
  4. No contact information, emails, phone numbers, or social media links present.
  5. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  6. No security headers or HTTPS information available from provided data.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit exceeded error.
  8. No advertising or analytics scripts detected.
  9. Site is accessible without WAF or security challenge.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with simple HTML and CSS, lacking modern frameworks or CMS platforms. No JavaScript libraries or analytics tools are detected, indicating minimal technical complexity. The site includes a background video element and two linked images with alt text, but no metadata or structured data for SEO. Mobile responsiveness is basic, and accessibility features are minimal. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are unavailable. Performance is likely moderate given the simple content but could be improved with optimization. The technical debt is low but modernization opportunities exist to enhance user experience and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with agh.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review agh.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.