Skip to main content

Security report for agb.it

Alban Giacomo SpA · Manufacturing · Italy

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Alban Giacomo SpA operates as a manufacturer and distributor of door, window, and fire-resistant door hardware, targeting the hospitality and construction sectors primarily in Italy and Europe. The company maintains a strong market position supported by ISO 9001 certification and a comprehensive product portfolio including locks, cylinders, hinges, and bolts. Their digital presence is supported by a multilingual website with clear navigation and professional branding. Technically, the website is built on ASP.NET WebForms with integration of modern marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics 4, Meta Pixel, and HubSpot CRM. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, although some accessibility features could be enhanced. The use of a cookie consent mechanism and detailed privacy policies indicates a mature approach to privacy compliance. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs standard security headers, though there is room for improvement by adding Content-Security-Policy and other headers. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of a public security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security incident handling. Overall, the website reflects a medium-sized manufacturing business with a solid digital infrastructure and compliance posture. Strategic improvements in security headers and incident response transparency would further enhance trust and resilience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  4. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching agb.it

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
35
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
80
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention agb.it, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
573
Employees
3
Customers
567
Third parties
3
Weak passwords
17%

Latest record dated 2026-05-13 · 7 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for agb.it.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –www.agb.it2026-05-13
  • –www.agb.it2025-09-19
  • –agb.it2025-07-20

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company is positioned as a specialized hardware manufacturer with a focus on quality and innovation, serving both direct customers and reseller networks. Their business model combines product manufacturing with software solutions for hospitality, indicating diversification. The presence of multiple language versions and social media engagement suggests an international outreach strategy. The company leverages certifications and compliance to build trust and maintain competitive advantage. Growth indicators include new product launches and active marketing campaigns via digital channels. Partnerships with service providers like Exetera for website development and use of HubSpot CRM for customer management indicate a professional operational ecosystem. The company’s transparent contact information and privacy compliance further support its credibility in the market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with enforced HTTPS and use of Google Tag Manager for controlled script deployment. Privacy compliance is robust with detailed policies and consent mechanisms. However, the lack of explicit Content-Security-Policy and other security headers such as X-Content-Type-Options could expose the site to certain client-side attacks. No evidence of vulnerable libraries or exposed credentials was found. Incident response readiness is unclear due to missing public security policy and absence of dedicated security contact channels. The company should consider publishing a security.txt file and providing clear incident reporting contacts to improve transparency and preparedness. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhancements in header policies and incident response visibility.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate XSS and related attacks.
  2. Add X-Content-Type-Options and other recommended security headers to strengthen browser security.
  3. Publish a public security policy and provide dedicated incident response contact information.
  4. Consider creating and hosting a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Alban Giacomo SpA
VAT number
it00143780245
Registration number
REA di Vicenza n. 91225
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Alban Giacomo SpA
Description
AGB is a company specializing in door, window, and fire-resistant door hardware products, offering solutions for hospitality and other sectors.
Key services
Door hardware, Window hardware, Fire resistant door hardware, Software solutions for hospitality
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
ASP.NET WebForms, jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics 4, Meta Pixel, Iubenda Cookie Solution
Frameworks
ASP.NET
Platforms
Windows Server (implied by ASP.NET)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and analytics with opt-out options
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics 4, Google Analytics Advertising Reporting Features, Meta Events Manager
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Ads, Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Meta Pixel, Google Analytics Advertising Reporting Features, Google Analytics 4, Meta Events Manager
Marketing tools
HubSpot CRM
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and multilingual support.
  2. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanisms.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address.
  4. Use of modern analytics and marketing tools with opt-out options.
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information found.
  6. ISO 9001 certification displayed indicating quality management standards.
  7. No signs of WAF blocking or content restrictions.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature ASP.NET WebForms platform with Kentico CMS components, integrating modern front-end libraries like jQuery and Bootstrap. It uses Google Fonts, Google Maps, and YouTube widgets for enhanced content delivery. Analytics and marketing tools are well integrated, including Google Analytics 4, Meta Pixel, and HubSpot CRM, supporting extensive user tracking and marketing automation. Performance is moderate, with some images loaded lazily and a responsive design approach. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, some legacy technologies like WebForms may pose modernization challenges. Hosting details are not explicit but likely on Windows-based infrastructure. Overall, the technical stack supports business needs effectively but could be modernized for improved performance and maintainability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with agb.it. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review agb.it.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.