Skip to main content

Security report for afrportal.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website afrportal.com hosts a customer login portal titled 'Affinity Fundraising Registration' for the Affinity Single Portal® service. The portal appears to be designed for customers to access fundraising management services. The domain was registered in early 2022 and is currently active with Cloudflare DNS services. The site uses basic web technologies including HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and jQuery, with a slider captcha (QapTcha) implemented to prevent automated login attempts. The content is minimal and focused solely on login functionality without additional business or policy information. From a technical perspective, the site employs standard web technologies but lacks advanced security headers and visible HTTPS enforcement details in the provided data. The use of Cloudflare DNS and a reputable registrar adds some trustworthiness. However, the absence of privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, as well as lack of contact information, limits the site's compliance and transparency. Security posture is moderate with some anti-bot measures but missing critical security headers and no visible multi-factor authentication. The domain registration data is consistent with the business purpose and shows no suspicious patterns. Overall, the site is functional but basic, with room for improvement in security, privacy compliance, and user trust signals. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, improving form security, and providing clear contact information to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching afrportal.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Affinity Single Portal® appears to be a niche service focused on fundraising management, targeting customers who require secure access to their fundraising accounts. The business model revolves around providing a secure portal for customer login and management. The domain age and registration details suggest a relatively new business or service launched in 2022. The lack of public-facing business information or marketing content indicates a focus on existing customers rather than broad market outreach. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data. The portal's simplicity suggests a small-sized operation with a specialized service offering.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is moderate but incomplete. The presence of a slider captcha is a positive anti-automation control. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces protection against common web attacks. There is no visible multi-factor authentication or detailed privacy/security policies. The domain uses Cloudflare DNS but does not have DNSSEC enabled, which could improve DNS security. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. Overall, the site would benefit from enhanced security controls and transparency to meet modern compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS integrity and security.
  2. Implement and verify HTTPS with strong TLS configuration and HSTS headers.
  3. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  4. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  5. Provide visible contact information and incident response channels for security and support.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Affinity Single Portal® Customer Login page for fundraising registration access.
Key services
Customer login portal for fundraising management
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS, JavaScript, jQuery, jQuery UI, QapTcha (slider captcha)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of slider captcha (QapTcha) to prevent automated login attempts
  • Domain status is OK with no DNSSEC enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a simple login portal for Affinity Single Portal® customers.
  2. No public privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on this page.
  3. No contact information or business details provided on this page.
  4. Use of slider captcha indicates some anti-bot measures.
  5. No external marketing or analytics scripts detected.
  6. No social media or external links except for scripts and stylesheets.
  7. WHOIS data shows domain registered in 2022 with no DNSSEC and Cloudflare name servers.
  8. No security headers or advanced security features visible in provided data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a basic technology stack including HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and jQuery libraries. The inclusion of QapTcha slider captcha indicates some effort to prevent automated abuse. Hosting appears to be managed via pair Networks with DNS services through Cloudflare. The site lacks modern CMS or frameworks and shows minimal SEO optimization. Performance is likely moderate given the simple page structure. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but could be improved. No analytics or marketing tools are detected, indicating a focus on functionality over marketing. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities exist to improve security and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with afrportal.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review afrportal.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.