Skip to main content

Security report for africafucking.com

Other · N/a

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in Email security, Network security and 3 other checks.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AfricaFucking.com is an adult entertainment website specializing in ebony and African-themed pornographic photos and videos. The site primarily serves an adult audience interested in niche adult content and monetizes through affiliate marketing by linking to multiple related adult sites. The website has been registered since 2003, indicating a long-standing presence in this niche market. However, the site lacks transparency in business information, contact details, and compliance documentation such as privacy or cookie policies. Technically, the website uses basic HTML and CSS with Google Fonts for styling. There is no evidence of modern CMS or advanced frameworks. Mobile optimization and accessibility are minimal, and no analytics or tracking scripts are detected. Security practices are weak, with no DNSSEC, no security headers, and no visible HTTPS enforcement in the provided data. The domain is registered with a reputable registrar but lacks registrant details, which reduces trust. From a security perspective, the site shows minimal adherence to best practices. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, lack of security headers, and no contact or incident response information indicate a low security maturity level. The domain age supports legitimacy in terms of longevity, but the lack of transparency and security measures poses risks. Overall, the website scores low on professionalism, security, and privacy compliance. Strategic improvements in security headers, HTTPS enforcement, privacy documentation, and business transparency are recommended to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching africafucking.com

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
35
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the adult entertainment sector with a focus on ebony and African-themed content, targeting adult consumers seeking niche pornographic media. Its business model relies heavily on affiliate marketing, linking to numerous partner adult sites. The site appears to be small in scale with basic content quality and limited technical sophistication. There is no evidence of a parent company or subsidiaries. The lack of contact information and compliance policies suggests a low level of corporate governance. The site’s long domain age indicates sustained operation but does not compensate for the absence of trust signals or certifications.

Security posture

The security posture of AfricaFucking.com is weak. The site lacks essential security headers, DNSSEC is not enabled, and there is no visible enforcement of HTTPS in the provided data. No privacy or cookie policies are present, and no incident response or security contact information is available. These gaps expose the site to potential risks including data interception, clickjacking, and cross-site scripting attacks. The absence of vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files further reduces transparency. The domain registrar status clientTransferProhibited is a positive indicator but insufficient to offset other security weaknesses.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Implement essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  4. Add clear contact information including security and abuse contacts to improve incident response readiness.
  5. Consider implementing a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to enhance transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Website providing adult content focused on ebony/black/African themed pornographic pictures and videos.
Key services
Adult pornographic photo and video content, Affiliate links to related adult sites
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, Google Fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
poor
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content portal focused on ebony/black/African pornographic media.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the main page.
  3. No contact information or security policies are provided.
  4. Multiple affiliate links to related adult websites are present.
  5. No modern security headers or DNSSEC enabled.
  6. Domain is old and registered with a known registrar but lacks transparency on ownership.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the HTML content.
  8. Mobile optimization is basic; site uses Google Fonts and simple CSS.
  9. No forms or user input fields detected on the main page.
  10. No social media or email contact links found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic HTML and CSS with Google Fonts for typography. There is no evidence of a CMS or advanced JavaScript frameworks. The site appears to be static with affiliate links embedded in tables. Mobile optimization is basic, and accessibility features are minimal or absent. Performance is likely moderate given the simple structure but could be improved with modern techniques. The lack of analytics or tracking scripts suggests minimal user data collection. The domain is registered with NameCheap, Inc., but hosting provider details are not explicit. Overall, the technical infrastructure is simple and dated, with opportunities for modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with africafucking.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review africafucking.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.