Skip to main content

Security report for afognak.com

Afognak Native Corporation · Government · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Afognak Native Corporation is an established Alaska Native Corporation formed under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act in 1971, serving over 1,000 shareholders. The corporation focuses on providing social, cultural, and economic benefits to its shareholders through sustainable business operations and land management. The website reflects a professional corporate presence with clear mission statements, values, and shareholder resources. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and themes, offering moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain registration protections, but lacks advanced DNS security and security headers. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie consent mechanism but no explicit privacy or terms of service pages. Overall, the site is trustworthy and serves its community effectively, though improvements in security and compliance documentation are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching afognak.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
88
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
85
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention afognak.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
3
Employees
0
Customers
3
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for afognak.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Afognak Native Corporation occupies a niche market as a Native Corporation with a defined shareholder base, leveraging cultural heritage and land assets. Its business model centers on sustainable growth and shareholder benefits, supported by a medium-sized organizational structure. The corporation's digital presence is focused on transparency and community engagement, with clear navigation and corporate information. The absence of social media links and limited contact details suggest a controlled communication strategy. The corporation's long domain age and consistent WHOIS data reinforce its legitimacy. There is opportunity to enhance digital marketing and security posture to strengthen stakeholder trust and compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS and domain transfer protections. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces resilience against DNS spoofing and clickjacking attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which could hinder timely security issue management. The use of WordPress necessitates regular updates to mitigate plugin vulnerabilities. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but can be improved by adopting recommended best practices and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to enhance security readiness.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate known vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Afognak Native Corporation
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Afognak Native Corporation
Description
Afognak Native Corporation (ANC) is an Alaska Native Corporation formed under the 1971 Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act and through the 1977 merger of two Alaska Native village corporations. It serves over 1,000 shareholders, providing social, cultural, and economic benefits by building a sustainable, growing enterprise.
Key services
Land management, Shareholder benefits, Business operations, Cultural resource management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Slider Revolution, Tatsu Page Builder, Exponent Theme, EasyDNS (DNS provider)
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based corporate site for Afognak Native Corporation.
  2. Content focuses on corporate mission, values, shareholder information, and community engagement.
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service pages explicitly found.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via be-gdpr plugin.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  7. Contact information includes physical address and contact form; no explicit emails or phone numbers found in visible content.
  8. No social media links detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  9. Website uses modern web technologies and plugins but lacks some advanced security headers and DNSSEC.
  10. No advertising or tracking scripts detected beyond GDPR consent plugin.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the Exponent theme and Tatsu page builder, supplemented by plugins such as Slider Revolution and be-gdpr for GDPR compliance. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets from its own domain and Google Fonts, with jQuery as a core library. Performance is moderate with some asynchronous script loading. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO meta tags are present but no advanced structured data (JSON-LD) or Open Graph tags were detected in the provided content. Hosting provider is not explicitly identified but DNS is managed by EasyDNS and domain registered via eNom. Technical debt appears low but security enhancements are recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with afognak.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review afognak.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.