Skip to main content

Security report for affsalvador.com

BS Affiliates · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BS Affiliates operates an online affiliate marketing platform primarily targeting affiliate marketers interested in gambling-related offers. The business model centers on providing affiliates with tracking links, marketing materials, and competitive commission plans including revenue share and lifetime commissions. The website is newly launched in 2023 and positions itself as a competitive player in the affiliate marketing industry with a focus on partnership and support. Technically, the site uses a modern but basic technology stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, and slick slider, hosted likely via GoDaddy. The site is mobile optimized with good navigation and content quality. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacking visible security headers and DNSSEC is not enabled. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Contact is only via web form with no direct emails or phone numbers published. Overall, the site is functional and professional but could improve in security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching affsalvador.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets affiliate marketers in the gambling sector, offering flexible commission plans and marketing tools to attract and retain affiliates. The business model relies on volume-based revenue sharing and CPA plans, supported by real-time statistics and prompt payments. The market positioning is competitive but the company is newly established, which may impact trust and growth. Social media presence on major platforms supports marketing efforts. The lack of direct contact details and limited transparency on security and compliance may affect credibility. No certifications or formal compliance frameworks are indicated, suggesting an early-stage operation.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS but lacks DNSSEC and security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS. No incident response or security policy information is published. Forms are present but no explicit security measures or anti-bot protections are visible. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms and vulnerability disclosure policies indicates gaps in privacy and security compliance. The domain registration is transparent and consistent with the business launch timeline, reducing suspicion. Overall security maturity is moderate but improvements are needed to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security.
  2. Implement standard security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner and explicit cookie policy to comply with privacy regulations.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance trust.
  5. Provide direct contact emails and phone numbers for business and support inquiries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BS Affiliates
Description
Offers an online affiliate program focused on partnership with affiliates, providing marketing tools, detailed reports, fast payments, and support.
Key services
Affiliate account registration, Tracking links and marketing materials, Revenue share commissions, Lifetime commissions, Real-time statistics, Prompt payments, Customer support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.1.3, Bootstrap 3.3.5, Slick Slider, Chosen jQuery plugin, jQuery Validate, jQuery Form
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical link)
  • ClientDeleteProhibited domain status flags

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Tracking links, Creative marketing materials
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a newly launched affiliate marketing platform focused on gambling-related offers.
  2. Content is primarily in Turkish with English sections.
  3. No explicit privacy cookie consent mechanism detected.
  4. No visible security headers or advanced security policies published.
  5. Social media presence is active on major platforms.
  6. Contact available only via web form; no direct email or phone contacts found.
  7. No certifications or security compliance frameworks mentioned.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a custom or unknown CMS using jQuery 2.1.3, Bootstrap 3.3.5, and slick slider for UI components. The site loads moderate performance scripts and is mobile responsive. SEO is basic with canonical tags and meta viewport settings. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA roles implied but no explicit advanced features. Hosting appears to be via GoDaddy based on registrar and nameservers. No modern frameworks like React or Angular detected. The site could benefit from modernization and performance optimization. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected in the provided content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with affsalvador.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review affsalvador.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.