Skip to main content

Security report for affiliateport.eu

AffiliatePort.eu · E-commerce · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AffiliatePort.eu is a well-established international affiliate marketing network based in the Czech Republic, operating for over 12 years. It offers a comprehensive affiliate platform with a strong partner base, proprietary performance projects, and services tailored for advertisers and publishers. The company is positioned as one of the leading affiliate networks in Central and Eastern Europe, supported by a professional website with multilingual support and clear business communication. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and frameworks, ensuring good SEO, mobile optimization, and user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS, reCAPTCHA, and cookie consent mechanisms, though it lacks explicit security policies or vulnerability disclosure pages. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, reinforcing trust and legitimacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching affiliateport.eu

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
90
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
25
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention affiliateport.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
110
Employees
0
Customers
110
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
9%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for affiliateport.eu.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets e-commerce advertisers and publishers, providing affiliate marketing services that drive sales and brand visibility. Its business model revolves around performance marketing with a large network of affiliate partners and exclusive projects like cashback and loyalty programs. The presence of strong partners and references, along with membership in industry associations, indicates a mature market position. Revenue streams likely include commissions from affiliate sales and service fees. The website content and structure support lead generation and partner engagement, reflecting a strategic focus on growth and market expansion.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with enforced HTTPS, Google reCAPTCHA integration to prevent spam, and a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism that blocks tracking scripts until user consent. However, it lacks published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure programs, which are important for transparency and trust in the security domain. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party scripts is standard but should be regularly audited. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be enhanced with formal policies and disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate risks from vulnerable components.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security audits to maintain compliance with evolving standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AffiliatePort.eu
Description
Mezinárodní affiliate síť se silnou flotilou affiliate partnerů i vlastními úspěšnými výkonnostními projekty. Pomáhá partnerům a klientům zvýšit zisk prostřednictvím internetu.
Key services
Affiliate network services, Affiliate campaign management, Conversion tracking and reporting, Publisher recruitment and management, Performance marketing projects
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Slick Carousel, Google reCAPTCHA, Yoast SEO plugin, Contact Form 7, Cookie Law Info plugin, WP User Avatar plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration
  • Cookie consent with blocking scripts until consent
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads, Sklik (Seznam retargeting)
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Sklik retargeting
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Czech language with multilingual support.
  3. Strong compliance with GDPR and cookie regulations.
  4. Clear contact information with email and phone provided.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and WordPress CMS.
  6. Active use of marketing and analytics tools with consent mechanisms.
  7. No security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  9. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and business claims.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a WordPress CMS platform with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, and Slick Carousel for UI components. SEO is managed via Yoast plugin, and user interactions are handled with Contact Form 7 and WP User Avatar plugins. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for analytics, with Facebook Pixel and Sklik for advertising and retargeting. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, but accessibility is basic. The site uses Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection and cookie consent plugins for GDPR compliance. Hosting provider details are not explicit. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but could benefit from enhanced security headers and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 55/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with affiliateport.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review affiliateport.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.