Skip to main content

Security report for affc-uk.cz

Raab Computer s.r.o. · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Network security.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.affc-uk.cz represents a regional government-supported initiative named Audit Family Friendly Community (AFFC) focused on supporting municipalities in the Ústecký kraj region of the Czech Republic. The project aims to improve living conditions for families through systematic audits and implementation of community-chosen measures. The site is professionally designed with good content quality and clear navigation, targeting local government bodies and municipalities. The business model is non-profit/governmental support with key services including audits, workshops, and seminars. Technically, the website uses a variety of JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, FontAwesome, bxSlider, and others to enhance user experience. The site is mobile optimized and has basic accessibility features. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is evident. Performance is moderate with good SEO practices. From a security perspective, the site lacks visible security headers and the SSL configuration status is unknown. Cookie consent mechanisms and GDPR-compliant privacy policies are implemented, indicating awareness of privacy compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness, but the website content and business presence suggest legitimacy. Overall, the website is a good representation of a regional government project with solid content and privacy compliance but could improve in security hardening and transparency of domain registration. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers, verifying SSL configuration, and providing explicit contact information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
55/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching affc-uk.cz

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
95
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
55
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AFFC operates as a regional government-backed non-profit initiative focused on family-friendly community audits in the Ústecký kraj region. Its competitive advantage lies in its official support by local government and structured audit methodology. The business model is service-oriented, providing workshops, audits, and community support to municipalities. Revenue streams are likely government funding or grants. The target customers are municipalities and local government bodies. Growth indicators include ongoing workshops and expanding municipality participation. Partnerships with regional government and Raab Computer s.r.o. for web development are evident. The project maintains a focused niche with strong regional presence but limited broader market exposure.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate. The website uses HTTPS (assumed but not confirmed), has cookie consent mechanisms, and GDPR-compliant privacy policies. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS were detected, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The absence of WHOIS data and domain registration details is a concern for trust and legitimacy. No analytics or tracking scripts beyond cookie consent are present, reducing privacy risks. Overall, the site demonstrates basic security hygiene but requires improvements in headers, transparency, and incident readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Verify and ensure HTTPS is properly configured with strong SSL/TLS settings.
  3. Publish explicit incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to enhance trust.
  4. Provide clear company contact emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility.
  5. Investigate and resolve WHOIS data absence to improve domain registration transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Raab Computer s.r.o.
Description
Audit je rozšířením podpory obcí ze strany krajů a má pomoci v úsilí obcí o zlepšování podmínek života rodin. Významnou výhodou auditu je pomoc v realizaci těch opatření, která si obec na základě systematicky provedené analýzy sama zvolí a se souhlasem rady nebo zastupitelstva obce po dobu tří let realizuje a naplňuje.
Key services
Audit Family Friendly Community, Workshops and seminars, Support for municipalities to improve family life conditions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, FontAwesome, bxSlider, Fancybox, Remodal, Owl Carousel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent with express consent
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Czech language.
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible privacy protection or domain registration issues.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via forms.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented and GDPR compliant.
  5. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL status unknown.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond cookie consent script.
  7. No advertising or affiliate programs detected.
  8. Website uses multiple JavaScript libraries for UI and UX enhancements.
  9. Content is focused on government/non-profit community auditing project.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website employs a traditional front-end stack with jQuery and several UI libraries such as bxSlider, Fancybox, Remodal, and Owl Carousel for interactive elements and responsive design. The site uses FontAwesome for icons and has a structured CSS approach with separate stylesheets. No modern JavaScript frameworks or CMS platforms are detected, indicating a custom or legacy build. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization indicators. Accessibility is basic with room for improvement. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. The lack of detected hosting or CDN providers limits infrastructure insights. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with affc-uk.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review affc-uk.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.