Skip to main content

Security report for aerial.photography

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in Email security, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website aerial.photography is a single landing page dedicated to selling the premium domain name 'aerial.photography'. It targets domain investors and businesses interested in acquiring a premium domain to establish online identity and credibility. The business model is straightforward domain resale with an inquiry form for offers. The site uses common web technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, Google Analytics, and Google reCAPTCHA to provide basic functionality and spam protection. The technical infrastructure is moderate with basic mobile optimization and SEO features. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA but lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance documentation. Overall, the site is functional but minimalistic, reflecting its purpose as a domain sales landing page rather than a full business website.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Cloudflare, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aerial.photography

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The domain is positioned as a premium asset for sale, appealing to businesses seeking a strong online brand in aerial photography or related fields. The lack of company information and direct contact details suggests a reseller or domain broker model rather than an operating business. Revenue is likely generated from domain sales. The site uses Google Analytics for visitor tracking and reCAPTCHA for form security. There are no partnerships or subsidiaries indicated. The business ecosystem is limited to domain marketplace activities with no extended services or products.

Security posture

Security measures include HTTPS encryption and Google reCAPTCHA on the contact form to mitigate spam. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces the overall security posture. No privacy policy or cookie consent mechanisms are present, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. The site does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerabilities in the provided content. Incident response and security policies are not disclosed, limiting transparency. Overall, security is basic and could be improved to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent banner to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to strengthen security posture.
  3. Provide clear company contact information such as verified emails and phone numbers to increase business credibility.
  4. Enhance mobile responsiveness and accessibility to improve user experience and SEO.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Aerial.photography is available for purchase. Get in touch to discuss the possibilities!
Key services
Domain name sale, Domain inquiry/contact form
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 3.3.7, jQuery 2.0.2, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, Font Awesome 4.6.3, Google Fonts (Oswald), Custom CSS and JS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on form to prevent spam
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a single landing page for selling the premium domain aerial.photography
  2. No privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service found
  3. Contact only via inquiry form with Google reCAPTCHA
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers provided
  5. Uses HTTPS and common web technologies
  6. No security headers detected in provided data
  7. No social media or external business links besides third-party libraries and analytics
  8. No adult or questionable content detected
  9. WHOIS data shows privacy protection, typical for domain sales
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a classic Bootstrap 3.3.7 framework with jQuery 2.0.2, which is somewhat outdated but functional. Google Fonts and Font Awesome provide styling and icons. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are integrated for visitor tracking. The site loads moderately fast but could benefit from modernization to newer frameworks and improved performance optimization. Mobile optimization is basic, and accessibility features are minimal. No CMS is detected, indicating a custom or static site. Hosting provider details are not available from the provided data. The site uses HTTPS, which is a positive security indicator.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aerial.photography. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aerial.photography.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.