Skip to main content

Security report for aepartner.lv

AE Partner DK A/S · Manufacturing · Denmark

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AE Partner DK A/S is a medium-sized manufacturing and automation engineering company based in Denmark, specializing in the design and production of electrical panels, metal cabinets, containers, and e-houses. Established around 2013, the company serves industrial clients requiring complex automation systems and consulting services in outsourcing and machine safety analysis. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with detailed business information and client testimonials, positioning AE Partner as a trusted regional player with over 2300 projects completed. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Enfold theme, enhanced with Yoast SEO, WPML for multilingual support, and Google Analytics for tracking. It employs modern web technologies and is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement, Google reCAPTCHA on forms, and a cookie consent mechanism, although some security headers are missing, indicating room for improvement. The security posture is solid with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, but the absence of explicit security policies and incident response contacts suggests a need for enhanced transparency. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain registration trust verification, but the website's content and certifications support legitimacy. Overall, AE Partner's digital presence is professional and trustworthy, with strategic recommendations focusing on improving security headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing incident response readiness to further strengthen their security and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aepartner.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
40
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AE Partner operates in the manufacturing and energy sectors, focusing on electrical panel production and automation engineering. Their business model is B2B, targeting industrial clients requiring custom automation solutions. The company demonstrates growth through a substantial project portfolio and client base. Certifications like EcoVadis Bronze and memberships in export and commerce associations enhance credibility. The multilingual website and regional domain partnership indicate a strategy for broader market reach. Revenue streams likely include product manufacturing, consulting, and outsourcing services. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear contact channels and trust signals, supporting sustained business development and partnership opportunities.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from abuse. Cookie consent mechanisms align with GDPR compliance. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a notable gap. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, which could hinder transparency and readiness in case of incidents. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trust verification. Overall, the security maturity is good but can be enhanced by adopting additional security headers, publishing formal security policies, and providing incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining frameworks and incident response procedures.
  3. Add clear incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
AE Partner DK A/S
Registration number
Chamber of Commerce
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AE Partner DK A/S
Description
Manufacturer specialized in designing electrical documentation and producing Electrical Panels including Distribution Panels, MCC Panels and PLC Panels. Also produces metal cabinets, containers, and e-houses.
Key services
Electrical panels production, Metal cabinets manufacturing, Consulting in outsourcing and machine safety analysis
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA v2, jQuery, MediaElement.js, WPML Multilingual CMS, Cookie Law Info plugin, Smush Lazy Load
Frameworks
Enfold WordPress Theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent banner with settings
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO Premium
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. Strong presence of business and contact information
  3. Good use of SEO and analytics tools
  4. Cookie consent and privacy mechanisms implemented
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification
  6. No visible security headers detected, opportunity for improvement
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies found
  8. Certifications and memberships enhance trust
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Enfold theme, supported by plugins for SEO (Yoast), multilingual content (WPML), cookie management, and lazy loading images (Smush). It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and Google Ads for marketing. The site is mobile responsive and uses modern web fonts and lazy loading for performance optimization. The presence of Google reCAPTCHA enhances form security. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The lack of visible security headers and incomplete WHOIS data are technical risks that should be addressed to improve overall security and trustworthiness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aepartner.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aepartner.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.