Skip to main content

Security report for aenri.com

Other · Denmark

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website aenri.com is currently non-functional, displaying a PHP fatal error related to a WordPress contact form plugin. The domain is registered since 2014 with Ascio Technologies in Denmark, indicating a legitimate registration but the website itself lacks any accessible business content or contact information. There are no privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies present, and no security headers or advanced security configurations detected. The technical infrastructure is minimal and outdated, with no evidence of modern analytics or marketing tools. Overall, the website's digital maturity is very low, and it does not present a professional or trustworthy online presence. From a security perspective, the site has basic SSL but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, and the fatal PHP error represents a critical vulnerability that could expose the site to further risks or downtime. There is no evidence of incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. The overall risk assessment is high due to the broken website functionality, lack of security best practices, and absence of compliance documentation. Strategic recommendations include immediate remediation of the PHP error, implementation of security headers and DNSSEC, addition of privacy and cookie policies, and enhancement of contact and business information to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aenri.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The domain aenri.com is registered under a Danish registrar with a creation date in 2014, suggesting a mature domain. However, the website content is limited to an error message with no business description, contact details, or service information. This lack of visible business intelligence prevents assessment of market positioning, competitive advantages, or revenue streams. No partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated. The absence of marketing or analytics tools further limits insight into customer targeting or growth strategies. The business model and sector remain unknown due to lack of content.

Security posture

The website exhibits a low security maturity level. The presence of a PHP fatal error in a contact form plugin is a critical vulnerability that compromises site availability and potentially security. DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers are detected, reducing protection against common web attacks. SSL is present but only basic. There are no visible privacy or cookie policies, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. Overall, the security posture is weak and requires urgent improvements to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Fix the PHP fatal error in the contact form plugin to restore website functionality and prevent downtime.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Implement essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  4. Develop and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  5. Add clear contact information and business details on the website to improve credibility and customer engagement.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Performance
slow
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
20/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is currently non-functional due to a PHP fatal error in a WordPress plugin.
  2. No visible business or contact information on the website.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No security headers or advanced security configurations detected.
  5. Domain is registered with a reputable registrar and is not privacy protected.
  6. Minimal content and poor technical implementation indicate low professionalism and trust.
  7. No external marketing, analytics, or advertising technologies detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress but currently suffers from a fatal PHP error in a plugin, indicating poor maintenance and technical debt. No modern JavaScript frameworks or analytics tools are detected. The site lacks meta tags, SEO optimization, and accessibility features. Performance is likely slow due to error state and lack of optimization. Hosting provider details are not evident. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers indicates outdated technical configuration. Overall, the technical infrastructure is minimal and requires modernization and remediation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aenri.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aenri.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.