Security report for aem.org
Association of Equipment Manufacturers · Manufacturing · United States
The Association of Equipment Manufacturers (AEM) is a well-established industry association founded in 1997, serving the construction and agriculture equipment manufacturing sectors primarily in North America. The organization provides advocacy, market data, business intelligence, safety leadership, and organizes trade shows and events to connect members with customers and policymakers. The website reflects a professional and comprehensive digital presence with clear navigation, rich content, and consistent branding. It targets equipment manufacturers and industry professionals, offering a broad range of member services and industry insights. Technically, the website is built on the Kentico CMS platform and leverages modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA v3, and multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Hotjar, and Bing Ads. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, with good performance characteristics. Security practices include HTTPS enforcement, clientTransferProhibited domain status, and secure form handling with reCAPTCHA, although DNSSEC is not enabled and some security headers like Content-Security-Policy are missing. The security posture is solid with no critical vulnerabilities detected, but there is room for improvement in DNS security and header configurations. Privacy compliance is strong, with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms in place. The website does not expose sensitive data and uses secure marketing and tracking technologies responsibly. Overall, the website and domain demonstrate high legitimacy and trustworthiness, supported by consistent WHOIS data and a long domain age. The digital infrastructure supports the organization's mission effectively, though enhancements in security headers and DNSSEC would further strengthen the security posture.
Scanned
NIS2 and GDPR posture
- NIS2 outside view
- Not assessed
- GDPR outside view
- Not assessed
Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.
Priority findings
1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.
SSL/TLS
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
- High
Weak Protocols Supported
Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions
- CWE-327
- OWASP A04:2025
- ASVS V12.1.1
- RFC 8996
- RFC 7568
- Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: tls_versions TLSv1.2, TLSv1.3
- NIS2 21(2)(h)
- IR 2024/2690 9.2(b): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(b): Cryptography
- NIST SC-8(1): NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-8(1): Cryptographic Protection
- High
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
Keep watching aem.org
This scan found 11 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended€25per month
- TLS certificates and expiry
- DNS records
- SPF, DKIM and DMARC
- Security headers
- GDPR and NIS2 posture
- Exposed services
- Third-party trackers
- Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
- The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
- Email delivery with an unlock code
- Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
- SSL/TLS
- 82
- Email security
- 80
- DNS health
- 80
- Network security
- 100
- Average
- 86
- After the cap
- 75
Not counted
- Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
- GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
- NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
- OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
- The certificate is not trusted by browsers
- The website is not served over HTTPS
- A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
- The page loads a script from a compromised source
- The domain registration has expired
- SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
- Critical0–25
- High26–49
- Medium50–75
- Low76–100
Technical appendix
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Security posture
Recommendations
- Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
- Implement a robust Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate cross-site scripting and related attacks.
- Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website to improve transparency.
- Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and tracking technologies to minimize vulnerabilities.
- Enhance privacy disclosures regarding data retention and processing to strengthen GDPR compliance.
Contact details published on the site
- Addresses
- Legal name
- Association of Equipment Manufacturers
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
- Company
- Association of Equipment Manufacturers
- Description
- Advancing Equipment Manufacturers in the Global Marketplace. Advocacy, Safety, Trade Shows and Events and Market Data.
- Key services
- Advocacy, Business Intelligence, Education & Events, Market Share Statistics, Safety & Product Leadership, Trade Shows+, Workforce Solutions, Member Services
- Content quality
- excellent
- Branding
- consistent
Technology
- Stack
- Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Bing Ads, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Kentico CMS, Font Awesome, reCAPTCHA v3, YouTube API, Act-On Marketing Automation, OMappAPI
- Frameworks
- Bootstrap (implied by classes), Kentico CMS
- Platforms
- Web
- Performance
- moderate
- Mobile
- good
- Accessibility
- good
- SEO
- good
Security
- Observed score
- 75/100
- Good practices seen
- HTTPS enforced
- ClientTransferProhibited domain status
- Use of reCAPTCHA v3 on forms
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- Secure form submission endpoints
Analytics and tracking
- Services
- Google Analytics, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Bing Ads
- Tracking level
- extensive
- Privacy practices
- good
Advertising
- Ad networks
- Bing Ads
- Tracking pixels
- Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Hotjar
- Marketing tools
- Act-On Marketing Automation, OMappAPI
- Transparency
- good
Site quality
- Design
- excellent
- User experience
- excellent
- Content relevance
- excellent
- Navigation
- excellent
- Professionalism
- excellent
- Trustworthiness
- high
Key observations
- Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
- Content is rich, professional, and well-structured
- Strong presence of industry-related services and events
- Multiple Google Tag Manager containers used for different purposes
- Use of modern marketing and analytics tools
- Secure forms with reCAPTCHA v3 implemented
- No exposed sensitive data or security misconfigurations detected
- DNSSEC not enabled, which is a minor security gap
- No explicit terms of service page found
- Social media presence on Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Twitter
Technical notes
Notes
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
- MITRE CWE (opens in a new tab)4.20 (2026-04-30) · CWE Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP Top 10:2025 (opens in a new tab)2025 (membership per CWE 4.20) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- MITRE CAPEC (opens in a new tab)3.9 (2023-01-24) · CAPEC Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP ASVS (opens in a new tab)5.0.0 · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Web Security Testing Guide (opens in a new tab)latest (checklist.json, master) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Secure Headers Project (opens in a new tab)2026-10-18 · Apache-2.0
- Mozilla Server Side TLS (intermediate) (opens in a new tab)6.0 · MPL-2.0
- NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 (OSCAL catalog) (opens in a new tab)5.2.0 · Public domain (US Government work)
- Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 333, 27.12.2022 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 (opens in a new tab)OJ L, 18.10.2024 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 119, 4.5.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive 2002/58/EC (ePrivacy), consolidated (opens in a new tab)19.12.2009 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- RFC Editor metadata (opens in a new tab)per-RFC (obsolete RFCs rejected) · IETF Trust Legal Provisions (metadata only)
- NIST CSRC, W3C TR, IETF Datatracker, EDPB, EUR-Lex CELLAR and gesetze-bayern.de (opens in a new tab)per document · Titles and links only
- NIST NVD CVE API 2.0 (opens in a new tab)live records · Public domain (NVD); CVE® records © MITRE, free use
- W3C WCAG 2.2 (opens in a new tab)W3C Recommendation (wcag.json) · W3C Software and Document License
- ETSI EN 301 549 (opens in a new tab)V3.2.1 (2021-03), clause headings · Clause numbers and titles only (© ETSI)
- Directive (EU) 2019/882 (European Accessibility Act) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 151, 7.6.2019 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive (EU) 2016/2102 (Web Accessibility Directive) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 327, 2.12.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Feedback on this report
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with aem.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aem.org.