Skip to main content

Security report for aegisworld.com

GardaWorld Security · Other · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GardaWorld Security is a large, enterprise-level security services provider operating primarily in the United States with a broad range of security solutions including traditional security officers, K9 security, crowd management, and specialized industry services. The company positions itself as a proven alternative to traditional security services, emphasizing high-quality personnel and customized solutions. Their market position is strong, supported by a large workforce and extensive geographic coverage. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks such as React and Next.js, hosted on Vercel, and incorporates advanced performance and accessibility features. The presence of Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA v3, and OneTrust for cookie consent indicates a mature digital infrastructure with attention to privacy and security compliance. Security posture is robust with HTTPS enforced, security headers implied, and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, explicit security policies and incident response information are not found, representing an area for improvement. Privacy compliance is well addressed with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies and active consent mechanisms. Overall, the website and business demonstrate high professionalism, trustworthiness, and compliance, with minor recommendations to enhance transparency around security policies and vulnerability disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
63/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aegisworld.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
63
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GardaWorld Security operates in the security services sector with a diversified portfolio covering multiple industries such as healthcare, government, education, industrial, and retail. Their business model focuses on providing tailored security solutions leveraging a large, trained workforce. The company benefits from a strong brand presence, multiple subsidiaries and partners, and a comprehensive content strategy including insights and client success stories. Their target customers are businesses and organizations requiring reliable security services across the United States. The company shows indicators of growth and strategic partnerships, enhancing its competitive advantage.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, integration of reCAPTCHA v3 to prevent automated abuse, and cookie consent management via OneTrust. Security headers are present or implied, and no sensitive data leakage or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of a publicly available security policy or incident response plan limits transparency. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file was found, which could be improved to foster trust and responsible vulnerability reporting. Overall, the security posture is strong but could benefit from enhanced policy disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and controls.
  2. Implement and publicize an incident response plan with clear contact channels.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency around data retention and privacy practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GardaWorld Security
Description
GardaWorld Security provides trusted and innovative security solutions as an alternative to traditional security services. They focus on protecting businesses with custom solutions and have a strong presence across the United States with over 37,000 staff and 55+ offices in 48 states.
Key services
Security services, K9 security, Crowd management, Cash services, Government services, Healthcare security, Higher education security, Industrial security, Logistics and transportation security, Retail security
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Vercel Speed Insights, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA v3, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Frameworks
React, Next.js
Platforms
Vercel
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • reCAPTCHA v3 integration
  • Cookie consent management via OneTrust
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  2. Strong presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  3. Comprehensive business information and service offerings clearly presented.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and good performance metrics.
  5. Security best practices are followed, though explicit security policy and incident response info are missing.
  6. Multiple external domains linked, mostly related to subsidiaries and partners.
  7. Social media presence is active and linked.
  8. No suspicious or malicious indicators found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using React and Next.js frameworks, indicating a modern, component-based architecture optimized for performance and SEO. Hosting on Vercel provides scalability and fast content delivery. The site uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing, OneTrust for cookie compliance, and Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot mitigation. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. Performance is fast with preloading of critical assets. No major technical debt or outdated technologies were detected, positioning the site well for future enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aegisworld.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aegisworld.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.