Skip to main content

Security report for advokatuur.ee

Eesti Advokatuur · Government · Estonia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Eesti Advokatuur is an official Estonian public-law professional association responsible for organizing legal services and protecting the professional rights of advocates. The website serves as an information portal for advocates, law firms, and the public seeking legal assistance. It offers structured content about the organization's structure, services, news, and events. The technical infrastructure is modern, leveraging Vue.js and Nuxt.js frameworks with Tailwind CSS for styling, hosted by Zone Media OÜ. The site is well-optimized for performance and mobile devices, providing a good user experience. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled, but lacks explicit security headers and detailed privacy or cookie policies. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present, indicating room for improvement in security transparency. Overall, the domain registration and website content align well, supporting the legitimacy and credibility of the organization.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching advokatuur.ee

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
90
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Eesti Advokatuur holds a strong market position as the official legal professional body in Estonia, serving advocates and the public. Its business model is based on public-law mandates, focusing on legal service organization, professional rights protection, and continuing education through training programs. The website targets legal professionals and clients seeking legal aid. The organization maintains a medium-sized presence with a history dating back to 2010. The site reflects consistent branding and trust signals such as official logos and structured content. The absence of commercial advertising and tracking indicates a focus on professional and governmental service rather than commercial revenue streams.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security robustness. There is no visible security policy, incident response contact, or vulnerability disclosure mechanism, which are important for compliance and trust. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies suggests gaps in GDPR compliance. No vulnerable libraries or insecure forms were detected in the provided content. Enhancing security transparency and compliance documentation would improve the security posture significantly.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Add security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to strengthen site security.
  3. Provide clear contact information for incident response and vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Introduce cookie consent mechanisms to comply with privacy regulations.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization for broader reach and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Eesti Advokatuur
Description
Eesti Advokatuur on avalik-õiguslik kutseühendus, mis korraldab õigusteenuste osutamist era- ja avalikes huvides ning kaitseb advokaatide kutsealaseid õigusi. Advokatuur juhindub oma tegevuses seadustest, advokatuuri organite õigusaktidest ja headest tavadest.
Key services
Advokaatide kutsealane korraldus, Õigusteenuste korraldamine, Koolitused advokaatidele, Advokaatide registrid ja otsing, Uudiste ja sündmuste avaldamine
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Vue.js, Nuxt.js, Tailwind CSS, JavaScript ES Modules
Frameworks
Nuxt.js, Vue.js
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Use of modern JS frameworks

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking.
  2. Content is primarily in Estonian with English language option.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the visible content.
  5. Site uses modern frontend technologies (Vue.js, Nuxt.js, Tailwind CSS).
  6. WHOIS data shows domain registered since 2010 with a reputable registrar.
  7. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information.
  8. No social media links detected in the provided content.
  9. Site appears to be an official government or professional body website.
  10. No advertising or tracking scripts detected in the provided content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern frontend stack with Vue.js and Nuxt.js, ensuring good performance and mobile responsiveness. Tailwind CSS provides a consistent and scalable styling framework. Hosting is managed by Zone Media OÜ, a reputable Estonian provider. The site loads quickly and is well-structured, but lacks some SEO and accessibility enhancements. No major technical debt or outdated technologies were detected. Opportunities exist to improve metadata completeness, structured data usage, and accessibility compliance to enhance search engine visibility and user inclusivity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with advokatuur.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review advokatuur.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.