Skip to main content

Security report for advokatmatyas.cz

Advokát Václav Matyáš · Other · Czech Republic

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Advokát Václav Matyáš is an independent Czech legal practitioner offering a broad range of legal services including criminal, family, civil, commercial, real estate, labor law, and debt collection. The website positions the lawyer as experienced with a reputable Brno law firm and emphasizes personalized client service. The business targets individuals and entities in need of legal assistance primarily in the Czech Republic. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and frameworks, providing a responsive and professional user experience. Security posture is good with HTTPS and secure forms, though some security headers and policies could be improved. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant. WHOIS data is missing, which slightly reduces trust but the website content and contact information support legitimacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching advokatmatyas.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a solo legal professional with cooperation ties to a reputable law firm, indicating a niche but credible market position. The business model is service-based, focusing on legal advice and representation. Revenue streams likely come from hourly, flat, and contingent fees as described. The target market includes individuals and local entities in the Czech Republic. The website demonstrates good branding consistency and trust signals such as professional qualifications and contact transparency. Partnerships with other legal professionals and service providers enhance service delivery. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable gap but does not critically undermine business credibility given the professional presentation.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and secure contact forms with anti-spam honeypots, indicating a baseline security awareness. However, the absence of security headers like Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security or incident response policies suggest room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is well addressed with cookie consent and privacy policy. The missing WHOIS data is a concern for domain legitimacy verification but does not directly impact website security. Overall, the security posture is moderate to good but could be enhanced with additional headers and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  3. Add incident response contact information or a dedicated security contact email to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider verifying and publishing WHOIS domain registration details to enhance trust and legitimacy.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Mgr. Václav Matyáš, advokát
Registration number
IČ: 119 81 997
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Advokát Václav Matyáš
Description
Samostatný advokát s generální praxí a zkušenostmi z renomované brněnské advokátní kanceláře, poskytuje právní služby ve všech oblastech práva od trestního či rodinného práva přes vymáhání pohledávek, právo nemovitostí a právo obchodní až po rozličnou spornou i smluvní agendu.
Key services
Trestní právo, Rodinné právo, Občanské právo, Obchodní právo, Právo nemovitostí, Právo územních samosprávných celků, Pracovní právo, Vymáhání pohledávek, Exekuce a insolvence
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.7.2, PHP, jQuery, Bootstrap, Slick Carousel, Magnific Popup, Justified Gallery, Datepicker, Leaflet.js
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of contact form with spam honeypot fields

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional presentation.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and may warrant further investigation.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  4. Contact information is complete and includes multiple channels.
  5. No security.txt or incident response information found.
  6. No advertising or tracking services detected beyond necessary plugins.
  7. Website uses modern web technologies and is mobile optimized.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.7.2 with a modern tech stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery, and various plugins for UI enhancements such as Slick Carousel and Magnific Popup. Leaflet.js is used for interactive maps. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and uses CDN services for some scripts. Performance is moderate with lazy loading images and optimized assets. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Accessibility is basic but present. The site is mobile optimized and provides a professional user experience. Hosting provider is not explicitly identified from the data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with advokatmatyas.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review advokatmatyas.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.