Skip to main content

Security report for advokatiprotitotalite.cz

Česká advokátní komora · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'Advokáti proti totalitě' is an informational and commemorative platform operated by the Czech Bar Association (Česká advokátní komora). It focuses on honoring lawyers who opposed totalitarian regimes in Czech history, providing exhibitions, publications, conferences, and multimedia content. The target audience includes legal professionals, historians, and the Czech public interested in legal history and democratic values. The site holds a niche position within the Czech legal and historical community, operating as a non-profit educational resource. Technically, the website uses a modern but modest technology stack including jQuery, FontAwesome, Magnific Popup, FancyBox, and Google Analytics. It appears to be built on October CMS and uses the Foundation framework for responsive design. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, though accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic. HTTPS is enforced, but security headers are missing, and privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating room for compliance improvements. From a security perspective, the site benefits from HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the lack of security headers and absence of privacy and cookie policies reduce its security posture and privacy compliance. No WHOIS data was retrievable, which lowers domain trustworthiness, but the official association branding and content quality provide legitimacy. No forms or contact emails are present, limiting direct user engagement and incident response capabilities. Overall, the website is a professionally presented, content-rich resource with moderate technical maturity and security posture. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance, security headers, and contact transparency would enhance trust and compliance. The domain registration status should be verified to ensure legitimacy and reduce risk.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching advokatiprotitotalite.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website serves as a specialized commemorative platform under the Czech Bar Association, targeting legal professionals and the public interested in the history of legal resistance to totalitarianism. Its business model is informational and non-profit, focusing on educational content delivery through exhibitions, books, conferences, and multimedia archives. The site leverages partnerships with the Czech Bar Association and related legal entities, enhancing credibility. Growth potential lies in expanding digital content and outreach. The absence of commercial activities aligns with its non-profit nature. The partnership ecosystem includes official legal bodies and related media sites, supporting its mission. The platform maintains a consistent brand and professional content, positioning it as a trusted resource within its niche.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data leaks. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security weakens its defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, limiting transparency and readiness. The use of third-party tracking tools like Google Analytics introduces privacy considerations without visible consent mechanisms or cookie policies, indicating GDPR compliance gaps. The lack of contact information and security policies reduces user trust and incident handling capabilities. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are evident, the site would benefit from enhanced security headers, privacy compliance, and incident response documentation to improve its security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance and user consent mechanisms.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly update and audit third-party libraries and tracking scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities and privacy risks.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimizations to improve user experience and discoverability.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Česká advokátní komora
Description
Website dedicated to the history and stories of Czech lawyers who opposed totalitarian regimes, commemorating their contribution to freedom and democracy.
Key services
Historical exhibition, Publication of a book, Conference organization, Audio/video archives
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, FontAwesome 5.7.2, Magnific Popup 1.1.0, FancyBox 3.5.7, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Foundation (implied by foundation-mq class)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of integrity and crossorigin attributes on some external resources

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is focused on historical and legal commemoration
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided
  5. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks
  6. HTTPS is enabled and used consistently
  7. No security headers detected in provided data
  8. Google Analytics and Tag Manager used for tracking
  9. No forms detected on the homepage HTML content
  10. No structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) found in HTML head
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on October CMS with a Foundation responsive framework and uses common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, FontAwesome, Magnific Popup, and FancyBox. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for user tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and loads with moderate performance. However, no advanced SEO or accessibility features are evident, and security headers are missing. The hosting provider is not identifiable from the data. The site structure is clear with consistent branding and navigation. Technical debt appears low but could be improved by modernizing tracking consent and security configurations. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the site's informational mission but requires enhancements for security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with advokatiprotitotalite.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review advokatiprotitotalite.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.