advokaterne.com is a Danish legal services collective comprising independent law firms and lawyers, established since 1991. The website presents a professional image with clear contact information and social media presence, targeting clients seeking legal advice in Denmark. The business model focuses on personalized and ethical legal assistance by a team of eight lawyers. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with the Divi theme, leveraging modern web technologies and SEO best practices. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA usage, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, and does not publish privacy or security policies. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally maintained but could improve compliance and security transparency.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Network security
Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.
Critical
Critical Service Exposed: MySQL
Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server
What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
35
Average
43
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention advokaterne.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for advokaterne.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The company positions itself as a mature, small-sized legal services provider with a focus on quality and client engagement. Its market presence is supported by a long domain age and consistent branding. The business leverages digital tools like Google Analytics and social media to engage clients. No evidence of parent or subsidiary companies was found. The absence of privacy and terms policies suggests room for compliance enhancement. The firm’s direct contact details and social media links enhance credibility and client trust.
Security posture
The website employs HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA, indicating basic security awareness. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers reduces resilience against DNS attacks and clickjacking. No published security or incident response policies limit transparency. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found. The domain’s clientTransferProhibited status is a positive trust indicator. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be strengthened by implementing recommended best practices.
Recommendations
Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.
Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
Add a security policy and incident response contact information to demonstrate security readiness.
Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
advokaterne.com
Description
advokaterne.com er organisatorisk et kontorfællesskab mellem advokatvirksomheder og advokatselskaber. Kreativitet og kvalitet i rådgivningen og sagsbehandlingen er i høj grad betinget af erfaring, alsidighed, solid etik og en direkte kontakt imellem advokaten og klienten samt et personligt engagement i klientens problemer.
Key services
Legal advice, Assistance in various legal case areas
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Yoast SEO, WP Rocket
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enabled
Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
ClientTransferProhibited domain status
Analytics and tracking
Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic
Advertising
Marketing tools
Google Analytics by MonsterInsights
Transparency
basic
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website is professionally designed using WordPress and Divi theme.
Content is primarily in Danish targeting local Danish clients.
Contact information is clearly presented with phone and email in header.
Social media presence on Facebook and LinkedIn supports business legitimacy.
No privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in the provided content.
Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via CookieYes.
No explicit security or incident response policies published.
No DNSSEC enabled for domain, which is a security improvement opportunity.
Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for tracking with moderate user tracking level.
Technical notes
Notes
The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with the Divi theme, supported by jQuery and Google services for analytics and tag management. Performance is moderate with caching via WP Rocket. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site uses asynchronous loading for scripts and fonts, improving load times. No critical technical debt or outdated libraries were detected in the provided data.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with advokaterne.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review advokaterne.com.