Skip to main content

Security report for advokacie-praha.cz

Advokacie Praha · Other · Czech Republic

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Advokacie Praha is a small law firm based in Prague, Czech Republic, offering comprehensive legal services primarily in civil, commercial, corporate, and real estate law. The website presents a professional image with detailed team member profiles and clear contact information, targeting clients seeking legal assistance in these areas. The firm positions itself as a collaborative team of lawyers and legal assistants providing specialized legal support. Technically, the website is built using the Hugo static site generator, enhanced with Leaflet.js for interactive maps and jQuery for scripting. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and includes mandatory legal disclosures in PDF format, indicating compliance awareness. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and obfuscates emails via JavaScript to reduce spam, but lacks visible security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which are recommended for GDPR compliance. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness, though the website content and contact details appear legitimate. Overall, the site is professional and functional but could improve security and privacy compliance aspects.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching advokacie-praha.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
50
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention advokacie-praha.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for advokacie-praha.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The firm operates in the legal services sector, focusing on civil and commercial law with a niche in corporate and real estate law. Its business model is service-based, targeting individuals and businesses in Prague needing legal counsel. The website's clear presentation of team members and contact details suggests a client-centric approach. The firm does not display partnerships or subsidiaries, indicating an independent small business. The presence of mandatory disclosures and GDPR documentation reflects regulatory compliance efforts. The lack of social media presence or advanced marketing tools suggests a traditional client acquisition strategy. The firm’s market position appears stable locally but limited in scale. No revenue or founding year data is available, limiting deeper business intelligence insights.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture. It uses HTTPS, which is mandatory for secure communications. Emails are protected from direct scraping by JavaScript rendering, reducing spam risk. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options are detected, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. There is no visible cookie consent mechanism despite GDPR policy presence, which could be a compliance gap. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is published, limiting transparency in security management. The absence of WHOIS data is a concern for domain legitimacy and trust. Overall, the site is secure enough for informational purposes but should enhance security controls and compliance transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to improve web security.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner to comply fully with GDPR requirements.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to increase transparency and trust.
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to improve domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Advokacie Praha
Description
Tým spolupracujících advokátů a advokátních koncipientů poskytuje komplexní právní služby zejména v oblasti civilního práva se zaměřením na obchodní právo, právo korporací a právo nemovitostí.
Key services
civil law, commercial law, corporate law, real estate law
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Hugo 0.101.0, Leaflet.js 1.9.4, jQuery
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed emails in raw HTML (emails rendered via JavaScript)
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL https://)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  3. Site uses modern static site generator Hugo and Leaflet for maps.
  4. Contact info is clearly presented with multiple emails and phone numbers.
  5. No cookie consent banner found despite GDPR policy presence.
  6. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  7. No forms detected on the site; contact is via email and phone only.
  8. No social media links found in the HTML content.
  9. PDF documents provide mandatory disclosures and GDPR info.
  10. Site content is professional and relevant to legal services.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Hugo static site generator, which provides fast and secure delivery of content. It uses Leaflet.js for interactive mapping and jQuery for DOM manipulation. The site loads external CSS and JS resources from reputable CDNs such as unpkg.com and Google Fonts. The site is mobile responsive and uses modern HTML5 meta tags for viewport and compatibility. Performance is moderate, with deferred loading of fonts and minimal external dependencies. No CMS or dynamic backend is detected, reducing attack surface. However, no hosting provider information is available, and security headers are missing, which could expose the site to certain risks. The site does not use analytics or tracking scripts, indicating minimal user tracking. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with advokacie-praha.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review advokacie-praha.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.