Skip to main content

Security report for advantio.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website advantio.com is currently inaccessible due to a Cloudflare DNS resolution error (Error 1001), indicating that the domain's DNS configuration is not resolving properly. The domain is registered since 2004 with GoDaddy and uses Microsoft Online DNS servers, but DNSSEC is not enabled, which could improve DNS security. Due to the blocked content, no business information, contact details, or policies are available on the site. The technical infrastructure shows use of Cloudflare services for performance and security, but the DNS misconfiguration severely impacts availability and trust. From a security perspective, the lack of DNSSEC and absence of visible security headers or HTTPS information raises concerns. No privacy or cookie policies are present, and no contact or incident response information is found, indicating poor compliance and transparency. The site includes minimal tracking limited to Cloudflare's feedback and performance scripts. Overall, the website's current state represents a critical operational and security risk. The domain registration is legitimate and longstanding, but the DNS issues and lack of accessible content prevent meaningful analysis of business credibility or security posture. Immediate remediation of DNS configuration and enabling DNSSEC are recommended to restore availability and improve security.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching advantio.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention advantio.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
485
Employees
2
Customers
6
Third parties
477
Weak passwords
2%

Latest record dated 2025-07-20 · 3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for advantio.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –jira.advantio.com2025-07-20
  • –collab.advantio.com2025-07-20

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the website being inaccessible, no direct business intelligence data such as company name, services, or market positioning could be extracted. The domain age suggests a long-established entity, but the lack of accessible content and contact information limits insights into business model, target audience, or partnerships. The use of Microsoft Online DNS servers may indicate integration with Microsoft services. No related or partner domains were identified from the content.

Security posture

The security posture is currently weak due to DNS resolution failure and lack of DNSSEC. No security headers or HTTPS details were found, and no privacy or security policies are published. The site uses Cloudflare for protection, but the DNS misconfiguration undermines availability. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are visible. The minimal tracking is limited to Cloudflare's own feedback and performance monitoring. Overall, the site is vulnerable to availability attacks and lacks transparency in security practices.

Recommendations

  1. Resolve DNS configuration issues immediately to restore website availability.
  2. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections.
  4. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Publish comprehensive privacy, cookie, and security policies to improve compliance and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. Website is blocked by Cloudflare with DNS resolution error (Error 1001). Content is inaccessible. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare, Microsoft Online DNS
Performance
slow
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Cloudflare performance radar
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Sparrow
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is completely blocked by Cloudflare DNS resolution error (Error 1001).
  2. No visible business or contact information on the website.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No forms or user input fields detected.
  5. No social media or contact emails found.
  6. Website uses Cloudflare and Microsoft Online DNS but DNSSEC is not enabled.
  7. Domain is registered with GoDaddy and is active until 2026.
  8. No security headers or HTTPS information available from provided data.
  9. Minimal external links only to Cloudflare domains related to error page.
  10. Tracking limited to Cloudflare feedback and performance scripts.
Technical notes

Notes

The website relies on Cloudflare for CDN and security services and uses Microsoft Online DNS servers. The domain is registered with GoDaddy and is active until 2026. The DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a missed security opportunity. The site currently returns a Cloudflare error page indicating DNS resolution failure, preventing access to any actual content. The HTML is minimal and dedicated to error reporting and feedback collection via Cloudflare's scripts. No CMS or frameworks are detected. Performance and SEO cannot be assessed due to lack of content. The site is not mobile optimized or accessible in its current state.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with advantio.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review advantio.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.