Skip to main content

Security report for adultsites.top

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website adultsites.top operates as an adult content aggregator focusing on teen-themed pornographic sites, including highly illegal and unethical categories such as loli, bestiality, and rape/snuff content. It functions primarily as an affiliate marketing platform linking to external adult sites and providing download links. The site lacks any privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, and does not provide any contact or company information, indicating low business transparency and credibility. Technically, the site is basic with minimal modern web practices, no HTTPS enforcement, and no security headers, exposing it to security risks. The WHOIS data is missing or indicates the domain is unregistered or expired, which severely undermines the legitimacy of the domain. Overall, the site poses significant legal, ethical, and security concerns.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching adultsites.top

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business model is based on affiliate marketing and adult content indexing, targeting adult users interested in teen and extreme adult content. The site appears to be small scale with no clear company or organizational backing. Its market position is niche but highly controversial and likely illegal in many jurisdictions. Revenue streams likely come from affiliate commissions and advertising. The partnership ecosystem includes multiple suspicious and adult content domains. Growth indicators and professional business practices are absent, suggesting an informal or illicit operation.

Security posture

The security posture is poor with no HTTPS detected, no security headers, and no visible compliance with privacy regulations such as GDPR. The site exposes users to potential risks through unencrypted connections and links to illegal content. There is no incident response or security policy information available. The lack of transparency and security best practices increases the risk of abuse, legal action, and user harm.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate immediately to secure user connections.
  2. Remove or block links to illegal and highly questionable content to reduce legal risks.
  3. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with data protection regulations.
  4. Provide clear contact and business information to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Conduct a full security audit and implement security headers and best practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Sexy Teens and Young Girls Real Videos! Teen Porn Sites List of Naked Girls Home Made
Key services
Indexing and linking to adult content websites, Providing download links to adult videos and images, Advertising adult sites
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
poor
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
20/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
LiveInternet
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LiveInternet
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website hosts and indexes explicit adult content including illegal categories.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact or company information provided.
  4. WHOIS data is missing or domain is unregistered.
  5. Site uses multiple external links to suspicious and adult content domains.
  6. No HTTPS or security headers detected in provided content.
  7. Site design and content quality are basic and unprofessional.
  8. Tracking pixel from LiveInternet is present, indicating user tracking.
  9. Affiliate marketing is a key business model.
  10. No age verification or compliance with adult content regulations observed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic HTML and JavaScript with no detected CMS or modern frameworks. The site lacks mobile optimization and accessibility features. Performance is moderate but could be improved with modern web standards. The absence of HTTPS and security headers is a critical technical deficiency. The site relies heavily on external links and affiliate URLs, some of which are suspicious or illegal. There is no evidence of content management or security infrastructure, indicating technical immaturity and potential operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with adultsites.top. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review adultsites.top.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.