The website adultsites.link operates as an adult content link directory primarily focused on aggregating and redirecting users to various pornographic and adult-themed websites. The business model relies heavily on affiliate marketing and traffic exchange within the adult entertainment niche. The site targets an adults-only audience with explicit content including highly questionable categories such as rape and bestiality, without any visible age verification or content warnings. Technically, the site is basic with standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, hosted behind Cloudflare DNS but lacking modern security headers and accessibility features. The security posture is weak, with no privacy or cookie policies, no terms of service, and intrusive popup scripts that open new windows without user consent. The domain is newly registered with privacy protection, which is typical for adult sites but reduces transparency and trust. Overall, the site presents significant risks from a security, compliance, and ethical perspective.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Email security
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
Critical
No email authentication configured
Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing
What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
63
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention adultsites.link, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for adultsites.link right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The site occupies a niche position in the adult affiliate marketing ecosystem, aggregating links to a wide range of external adult sites, some of which promote illegal or unethical content. The business model is based on traffic monetization through affiliate referrals and traffic trading. There is no clear business entity or contact information, and the domain is privacy protected and recently created. The site lacks professional branding and trust indicators, relying on volume and variety of adult content links to attract users. The partnership ecosystem is unclear, with many suspicious external domains linked. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not transparent, and the site operates with minimal compliance or security standards.
Security posture
The security maturity level is low. The site uses HTTPS but lacks critical security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies. The presence of intrusive popup scripts and links to illegal content increases risk exposure. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating poor compliance with GDPR or other regulations. The domain uses WHOIS privacy protection, which is common but reduces transparency. Overall, the site is vulnerable to abuse and may expose users to unsafe content and privacy risks.
Recommendations
Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms.
Add security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to improve security posture.
Remove or control intrusive popup scripts to enhance user experience and reduce risk.
Establish clear contact and business transparency information to improve trustworthiness.
Conduct a thorough content audit to remove or disassociate from illegal and unethical content links.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf
Description
Website providing links to various adult content and pornographic sites, mostly user-contributed links and affiliate redirects.
Key services
Adult site link aggregation, Traffic exchange and affiliate referrals
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate
Technology
Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
poor
SEO
basic
Security
Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enabled
Analytics and tracking
Services
LiveInternet
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor
Advertising
Tracking pixels
LiveInternet, Blozoo
Marketing tools
Blozoo ranktool
Transparency
poor
Site quality
Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low
Key observations
Website is an adult content link directory with numerous external affiliate links.
No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
No contact information or business transparency.
Contains links to highly illegal and unethical content (rape, bestiality).
Uses privacy protection for WHOIS data.
No security headers detected; basic HTTPS only.
Contains intrusive popup script that opens new windows without explicit consent.
SEO and accessibility are minimal.
Advertising and tracking are present but not transparent.
No social media or official company contacts found.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built with basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without any detected CMS or modern frameworks. It is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS but does not leverage advanced security or performance optimizations. The site lacks mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is minimal with basic meta tags but no structured data or Open Graph tags. The presence of external tracking pixels and affiliate links indicates moderate user tracking without transparency. Technical debt is evident in the lack of security best practices and outdated content management. Modernization opportunities include adopting a CMS, improving mobile responsiveness, and implementing security and privacy standards.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with adultsites.link. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review adultsites.link.