Skip to main content

Security report for adrecord.com

Adrecord · E-commerce · Sweden

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

85/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Adrecord is a Swedish affiliate marketing platform established since 2010, recently unified with the Adtraction group to enhance service and technology. The company focuses on performance-based digital marketing through affiliates, influencers, and ambassadors, targeting e-merchants primarily in the Nordic region. Their platform offers measurable results, transparency, and personal support, positioning them as a reliable player in the e-commerce marketing sector. Technically, the website uses modern frameworks like Bootstrap and Google Tag Manager, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though lacks explicit security headers and incident response information. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain reduces trust slightly, but the strong branding and partnership with Adtraction support legitimacy. Overall, the site is professional, user-friendly, and compliant with GDPR requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching adrecord.com

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
80
Email security
95
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
85

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention adrecord.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
780
Employees
0
Customers
780
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
6%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for adrecord.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Adrecord operates in the competitive affiliate marketing industry with a focus on Nordic markets. Their business model is performance-based, charging advertisers only for real sales generated by affiliates and influencers. The recent unification with Adtraction suggests strategic consolidation to leverage technology and market reach. Their client portfolio includes well-known Nordic brands, enhancing credibility. The company targets e-merchants seeking scalable digital marketing solutions with transparent reporting and minimal administrative overhead. Growth indicators include platform enhancements and expanded service offerings such as ambassador programs. The partnership ecosystem centers around Adtraction, indicating a parent-subsidiary relationship. Overall, Adrecord demonstrates a mature business with clear market positioning and growth potential.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR, indicating a baseline of security and privacy awareness. However, the absence of common security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement in hardening the web application against common attacks. No incident response or security policy information is published, which could hinder timely handling of security events. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The WHOIS data absence raises concerns about domain registration transparency, which impacts overall trust. Enhancing security headers, publishing a security policy, and establishing incident response contacts would strengthen the security posture significantly.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to improve web security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve domain trust and legitimacy.
  4. Add phone contact information for customer support to improve business credibility and user trust.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Adrecord
Description
Adrecord is an affiliate network helping e-merchants scale and streamline digital marketing through partnerships with affiliates and influencers. They offer a performance-based model focusing on measurable sales growth, transparency, and personal service.
Key services
Affiliate marketing, Influencer marketing, Ambassador programs, Campaign management, Reporting and analytics
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, ApexCharts, Bootstrap, FontAwesome, Google Fonts
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and clear business focus.
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible domain registration issues or privacy protection.
  3. Strong branding and partnership with Adtraction group.
  4. Good privacy and cookie compliance with explicit consent mechanism.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  6. No phone numbers found; only email and physical address provided.
  7. No social media links detected in the HTML content.
  8. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including Bootstrap for responsive design, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and ApexCharts for data visualization. The site loads multiple deferred JavaScript bundles, indicating modular frontend architecture. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO meta tags present. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site uses Google Fonts and FontAwesome for styling and icons. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 68/100Medium18 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with adrecord.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review adrecord.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.