Skip to main content

Security report for ado.cz

Arcibiskupství olomoucké · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Arcibiskupství olomoucké is the official website of the Olomouc archdiocese, a religious non-profit organization serving the Catholic community in the Czech Republic. The site provides comprehensive information about the archdiocese's structure, events, pastoral activities, and spiritual resources. It targets parishioners, clergy, and the general public interested in the church's activities in the region. The website is well-branded, consistent, and offers clear navigation and relevant content.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ado.cz

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ado.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
6
Employees
0
Customers
3
Third parties
3
Weak passwords
50%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for ado.cz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates as a non-profit religious entity with a medium-sized digital presence. It leverages WordPress CMS with popular plugins for content management, event scheduling, and contact forms. The site maintains active social media channels and partners with related church and religious sites. Its business model focuses on community engagement, information dissemination, and spiritual support rather than commercial activities. The domain age and WHOIS data align with the organization's history, supporting legitimacy and trust.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with good SSL configuration and uses security best practices such as nonce tokens in AJAX requests. However, it lacks explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, and does not publicly disclose a security policy or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The security posture is solid but could be improved by adding missing headers and formal security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a cookie consent banner to comply fully with GDPR requirements.
  2. Add and configure security headers such as CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Maintain regular updates of WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Conduct periodic security audits and penetration testing to ensure ongoing protection.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Arcibiskupství olomoucké
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Arcibiskupství olomoucké
Description
Oficiální stránky Olomoucké arcidiecéze
Key services
Information about archdiocese structure and activities, Event calendar and announcements, Pastoral and spiritual resources, Contact and support services, Media and publications
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.7.4, Yoast SEO plugin, WPBakery Page Builder, Event Post plugin, Contact Form 7, Post Views Counter, Widget Options, Google Fonts (Open Sans, Merriweather)
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
PHP-based CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of nonce in AJAX requests (Contact Form 7)
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
navrcholu.cz (likely analytics/tracking)
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
navrcholu.cz
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is an official religious institution site for the Olomouc archdiocese.
  2. Content is comprehensive, well-structured, and regularly updated with news and events.
  3. Good use of SEO and structured data for enhanced search visibility.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address.
  5. No evidence of security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  6. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite GDPR policy presence.
  7. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected; minimal tracking used.
  8. Site uses WordPress with common plugins and appears maintained.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site fully accessible.
  10. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.7.4 using a modern tech stack including Yoast SEO and WPBakery Page Builder. It uses Google Fonts and several plugins for events, contact forms, and analytics. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is well implemented with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Hosting provider details are not explicit. The site is stable and professionally maintained but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 59/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ado.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ado.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.