Skip to main content

Security report for admiral-games.de

ADMIRAL Entertainment Holding Germany GmbH · Other · Germany

High risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ADMIRAL Entertainment Holding Germany GmbH operates as a prominent gaming and entertainment company in Germany, specializing in the operation of modern game halls and providing a wide range of gaming machines and services. As part of the reputable NOVOMATIC AG group, ADMIRAL leverages both tradition and innovation to deliver unique leisure experiences to its customers. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image targeting German-speaking audiences, with clear navigation and relevant business content. Technically, the site is built on TYPO3 CMS and uses modern frameworks like Bootstrap, but suffers from critical security shortcomings due to the lack of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support. Security headers are implemented, and cookie consent mechanisms are in place, indicating a basic level of privacy compliance. However, the absence of HTTPS significantly undermines the site's security posture. Overall, the business appears legitimate and well-established, with clear contact information and social media presence, but the technical security gaps present a risk that should be addressed promptly.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching admiral-games.de

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
50
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
18
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ADMIRAL holds a strong market position as a large-scale operator of gaming halls in Germany, supported by its parent company NOVOMATIC AG. The company focuses on delivering high-quality entertainment experiences while emphasizing responsible gaming and corporate social responsibility. Its business model revolves around physical gaming locations, supported by a digital presence that promotes career opportunities and corporate values. The company benefits from certifications such as the G4 certification for player protection, enhancing its trustworthiness. The website's integration with marketing and analytics tools like Google Tag Manager and Jobspreader indicates an active approach to user engagement and recruitment. The presence of social media links to professional networks like LinkedIn and Xing further supports its business credibility and outreach efforts.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with several security headers implemented, including X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-XSS-Protection. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and the lack of HTTPS support are critical vulnerabilities that expose users to potential data interception and undermine trust. No modern TLS protocols are enabled, and advanced security features such as HSTS, OCSP stapling, and session resumption are missing. There is no visible security policy or incident response contact information published on the site. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented with opt-in and revocation capabilities, reflecting some compliance with privacy regulations. Overall, the security posture is weak and requires immediate remediation to protect user data and maintain compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire website.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and disable outdated or insecure protocols.
  3. Implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload directives.
  4. Enable OCSP stapling to improve certificate validation performance and security.
  5. Publish a clear security policy and provide incident response contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email).
  6. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and improving cookie consent transparency.
  7. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ADMIRAL Entertainment Holding Germany GmbH
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS, a mature and widely used content management system, combined with Bootstrap for responsive design. The site uses Apache as the web server and integrates Google Tag Manager and Jobspreader for analytics and marketing. Despite a modern tech stack, the site suffers from poor performance metrics (loadTime and resourceCount reported as zero, indicating possible measurement issues or slow loading). Mobile optimization is good, with responsive navigation and accessible menus. SEO is supported by meta tags, canonical links, and structured data in JSON-LD format. However, the lack of HTTPS and modern TLS protocols is a significant technical risk. The site does not appear to use advanced hosting or CDN services explicitly. Accessibility is basic, with some ARIA labels and semantic HTML elements present but no detailed accessibility features detected.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with admiral-games.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review admiral-games.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.