Skip to main content

Security report for admiral.at

ADMIRAL Sportwetten · Other · Austria

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ADMIRAL Sportwetten operates an online sports betting platform primarily targeting German-speaking users in Austria. The website offers sports betting services with a focus on providing competitive odds. The business model revolves around online gambling, catering to mature audiences interested in sports wagering. The site branding is consistent and the content is relevant to its target market, though the content quality is basic with limited visible business contact information or policy disclosures. Technically, the website employs modern front-end technologies including Bootstrap and OverlayScrollbars, ensuring a responsive and moderately optimized user experience. However, the absence of visible security headers and privacy-related policies indicates gaps in security and compliance maturity. No advanced analytics or advertising technologies were detected, suggesting minimal tracking or marketing integrations. From a security perspective, the site lacks explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The WHOIS data aligns well with the business claims, showing consistent registration details and domain age appropriate for the business. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, and the site content is fully accessible. Overall, the website demonstrates a functional but basic digital presence with room for improvement in privacy compliance, security posture, and transparency. Strategic enhancements in these areas would strengthen trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching admiral.at

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention admiral.at, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2,209
Employees
19
Customers
2,069
Third parties
121
Weak passwords
27%

Latest record dated 2026-06-06 · 11 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for admiral.at.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –owa.admiral.at2026-06-06
  • –owa.admiral.at2026-05-12
  • –owa.admiral.at2026-04-30
  • –confluence.admiral.at2026-03-27
  • –vdi.admiral.at2026-03-27

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ADMIRAL Sportwetten is positioned as a regional online sports betting provider in Austria, targeting sports enthusiasts and gamblers. The business leverages online platforms to deliver betting services, likely generating revenue through betting margins and customer engagement. The lack of visible partner or subsidiary domains suggests a focused operational scope. The absence of detailed business information and contact data limits deeper insights into corporate structure or growth indicators. The company appears to maintain consistent branding and a straightforward service offering, with potential for expansion in digital marketing and compliance transparency.

Security posture

The current security posture of the website is basic and lacks several best practices. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or Strict-Transport-Security were detected in the provided HTML content. There is no visible privacy policy, cookie consent mechanism, or incident response information, which are critical for GDPR compliance and user trust. The absence of vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files further indicates limited security transparency. While HTTPS is presumed (based on URL), SSL configuration details are unknown. The site does not expose sensitive data in the analyzed content, but the lack of security controls and policies represents a compliance and risk gap. Enhancing security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and establishing incident response contacts are recommended to improve security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure information, including security contact emails.
  4. Provide clear and accessible business contact information including emails, phone numbers, and physical addresses.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and update the website to address any identified vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ADMIRAL Sportwetten
Description
Online sports betting platform offering top betting odds.
Key services
Online sports betting
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, OverlayScrollbars
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a German-language sports betting platform targeting Austria.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided HTML snippet.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly found in the analyzed content.
  4. No social media links or external partner domains detected in the provided content.
  5. Technical implementation uses Bootstrap and OverlayScrollbars for UI.
  6. No security headers or explicit security policies detected in the HTML content.
  7. No analytics or advertising scripts detected in the provided snippet.
  8. Content is primarily informational and transactional for sports betting.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; content is accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with Bootstrap for responsive design and OverlayScrollbars for enhanced UI elements. The HTML structure is valid and includes meta viewport tags for mobile optimization. However, there is no evidence of a CMS or advanced backend technologies from the provided content. Performance appears moderate with standard CSS and JavaScript usage. SEO optimization is basic, with a canonical link and meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Accessibility features are minimal but present through semantic HTML and form controls. The site would benefit from enhanced SEO metadata, improved accessibility compliance, and integration of analytics tools for better performance monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with admiral.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review admiral.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.