Skip to main content

Security report for adluux.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security and Security headers.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'ADLUUX' appears to be a small-scale business or service entity established around 2019, as indicated by the domain registration date. The site uses modern web technologies such as Bootstrap 4 for styling and Google Analytics for visitor tracking, hosted under Amazon Registrar, Inc. The content available is minimal and primarily technical, lacking detailed business descriptions, contact information, or privacy and terms policies. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented, indicating some attention to privacy compliance, though no explicit privacy policy is found. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but lacking DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended for enhanced protection. Overall, the site is accessible without WAF or security challenges, but the lack of comprehensive content and contact details limits its business credibility and privacy compliance scores.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching adluux.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
15
Email security
45
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ADLUUX operates in an unspecified sector, with no clear business model or target audience discernible from the content. The domain age and registration details suggest a legitimate entity, but the absence of contact information and business descriptions limits insight into market positioning or partnerships. The use of standard analytics and cookie consent tools indicates some digital maturity, but the site would benefit from clearer business information and trust signals to improve credibility and customer engagement.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, which is fundamental for secure communications. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options exposes potential vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy information is available, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. The site should enhance its security posture by implementing recommended headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing clear security and privacy policies to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy to improve privacy compliance and user trust.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  4. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user support.
  5. Develop and publish security policies and incident response contacts to demonstrate security maturity and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, Bootstrap 4
Frameworks
Bootstrap 4
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses standard modern web technologies including Bootstrap 4 and Google Analytics.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the main page content.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is present via external library.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the provided HTML content.
  5. No social media links detected in the provided content.
  6. No security headers detected in the HTTP response headers (based on provided data).
  7. Domain is registered with Amazon Registrar, Inc. since 2019 and is active with standard domain status flags.
  8. No evidence of WAF or security challenge blocking access.
  9. Content is minimal and mostly technical styling and scripts; no visible business descriptive content in provided HTML.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Bootstrap 4 and includes Google Fonts and Font Awesome for styling and icons. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for tracking user interactions. The hosting and domain registration are managed by Amazon Registrar, Inc. The site shows moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. No CMS or advanced platform detected. The HTML and CSS appear valid and modern, but the site lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Technical improvements could focus on enhancing mobile responsiveness, accessibility compliance, and SEO metadata completeness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with adluux.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review adluux.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.