Skip to main content

Security report for adison.cz

Adison · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Adison is a modern PR agency based in the Czech Republic specializing in strategic, integrated, and creative public relations services. The company targets businesses seeking contemporary marketing communication solutions. The website reflects a professional brand image with consistent branding and good content quality, positioning Adison as a credible player in the PR sector. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern SEO and performance optimizations, including the use of Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though there is room for improvement in security headers and explicit privacy policy publication. Overall, the website demonstrates a mature digital presence suitable for a small PR agency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching adison.cz

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
90
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention adison.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for adison.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Adison operates in the PR and marketing communications sector, focusing on delivering strategic and creative PR services. The business model revolves around client engagement for marketing communication projects. The website's use of advanced tracking and marketing tools such as Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics, and behavioral tracking via Leady indicates a data-driven marketing approach. The absence of direct contact information on the site suggests a possible lead generation or contact via forms strategy. The company appears to be relatively new, founded around 2021, with no parent or subsidiary companies identified. The presence of structured data and cookie compliance mechanisms reflects awareness of regulatory requirements and digital marketing best practices.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. Cookie consent is actively managed with detailed categorization and third-party disclosures, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options indicates potential areas for strengthening defenses against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The absence of a security.txt file or explicit incident response contacts limits transparency for vulnerability reporting. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could benefit from enhanced header policies and clearer security communication.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web threats.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page clearly accessible from the website footer or main navigation to improve transparency and compliance.
  3. Add explicit contact information including company emails and phone numbers to facilitate customer and security incident communication.
  4. Create and publish a security.txt file to provide a formal channel for vulnerability disclosures and incident reporting.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize security risks and ensure compliance with evolving privacy regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Adison
Description
Jsme moderní PR agentura se specializací na strategické, integrované a kreativní PR.
Key services
Strategic PR, Integrated PR, Creative PR
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, WP Rocket, Splide.js, Poppins Google Font
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc., Google
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Cookiebot tracking
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Leady behavioral tracking
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection or domain not found in CZ NIC database.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed cookie categories and third-party providers.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in the provided content.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the visible content.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices evident.
  7. Extensive use of third-party tracking and marketing tools, with good transparency.
  8. No security headers detected in the provided data; opportunity for improvement.
  9. Content is professional, relevant, and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO plugin for search engine optimization. It uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tag management, and Cookiebot for cookie consent compliance. The site loads Google Fonts (Poppins) and uses the Splide.js library for UI components. Performance optimizations include WP Rocket caching and lazy loading. The site is mobile responsive with viewport meta tags and uses modern CSS variables for styling. No hosting provider details were found. The technical stack is modern and appropriate for a small to medium-sized PR agency, though opportunities exist to improve accessibility and security header implementation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with adison.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review adison.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.