Skip to main content

Security report for adhog.eu

ADHOG Advertising, s.r.o. · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ADHOG Advertising, s.r.o. is a small Czech marketing communication agency with over 20 years of experience, offering comprehensive creative services from concept to campaign evaluation. The company targets local and international brands seeking innovative and reliable marketing solutions. The website is built on WordPress using the Betheme theme and integrates standard technologies such as jQuery and Google reCAPTCHA for form security. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and presents clear contact information including multiple company email addresses and a physical address in Prague. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and CAPTCHA protection, though advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms are missing. The domain registration is consistent and trustworthy, supporting the legitimacy of the business. Overall, the website reflects a professional and credible marketing agency with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching adhog.eu

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a flexible, creative, and reliable marketing partner with a small but experienced team. Its business model focuses on providing end-to-end marketing communication services, including creative development, production, and campaign analysis. The target audience includes brands looking for both conservative and unconventional marketing approaches. The website content and structure support a clear brand message and demonstrate a consistent identity. The presence of a YouTube channel indicates some engagement in multimedia content. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the website or WHOIS data. The company appears to maintain a direct and transparent communication channel with clients via email and contact forms.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from automated abuse, which are positive security measures. However, it lacks implementation of important HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which could mitigate risks like clickjacking and MIME sniffing. There is no visible security policy or incident response contact information, nor a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism may pose GDPR compliance risks. Overall, the security posture is moderate to good but could be enhanced with additional best practices and compliance features.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen site security.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ADHOG Advertising, s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ADHOG Advertising, s.r.o.
Description
Marketing communication agency with over 20 years of experience offering comprehensive creative services including campaigns, production, and evaluation. Focus on creativity, reliability, flexibility, and speed.
Key services
Marketing communication, Creative campaigns, Production, Campaign evaluation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA, PrettyPhoto, jPlayer
Frameworks
Betheme WordPress theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration on forms

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is primarily in Czech with some English alternate pages hidden
  3. Company contact information is clearly presented with multiple company email addresses
  4. No explicit cookie consent mechanism found despite GDPR relevant privacy policy
  5. Security practices include HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA on forms but lack advanced security headers
  6. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy
  7. Website uses a popular WordPress theme and standard plugins
  8. No phone numbers explicitly labeled as company contact found
  9. Social media presence limited to YouTube channel linked
  10. No terms of service or security policy pages detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Betheme theme, leveraging jQuery and several plugins such as Contact Form 7 and PrettyPhoto. Google reCAPTCHA is integrated for spam protection on forms. The site loads external resources from trusted domains like fonts.googleapis.com and www.gstatic.com. Performance is moderate with standard optimization; mobile responsiveness is good. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO optimization includes meta tags and RSS feeds but lacks advanced structured data like JSON-LD. The technical stack is modern and widely supported but could benefit from enhanced security headers and privacy features to reduce technical debt and improve compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with adhog.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review adhog.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.