Skip to main content

Security report for addonify.com

Addonify · E-commerce · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Addonify is a specialized provider of WooCommerce addons designed to enhance e-commerce store performance and sales conversion. Founded in 2020, the company offers a suite of plugins including Quick View, Wishlist, Floating Cart, and Compare Products, targeting WooCommerce store owners seeking to improve user experience and sales efficiency. The website is built on WordPress using Elementor and Astra theme, leveraging modern web technologies and integrating analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and Cloudflare DNS, though DNSSEC is not enabled and security headers are absent. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site presents a professional and trustworthy image with good content quality and user experience but requires improvements in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching addonify.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention addonify.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for addonify.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Addonify occupies a niche in the WooCommerce plugin market, focusing on enhancing e-commerce functionality through specialized addons. Its business model revolves around plugin sales and support, targeting small to medium-sized WooCommerce store operators. The company demonstrates consistent branding and customer trust through testimonials and product showcases. Partnerships with theme providers and external login services indicate a collaborative ecosystem. The domain age and registration details align with the business timeline, supporting legitimacy. However, the absence of direct contact information and privacy policies may limit customer trust and compliance with regulations like GDPR.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and uses Cloudflare for DNS, which enhances security and performance. The domain status clientTransferProhibited prevents unauthorized transfers. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could mitigate certain attack vectors. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, and no security.txt file was found. The use of third-party analytics and tracking scripts introduces moderate user tracking, but no vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with enhanced DNS security, security headers, and transparency on security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection.
  4. Provide clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve trust and compliance.
  5. Implement and publish an incident response policy and consider adding a security.txt file for vulnerability disclosures.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Addonify
Description
Boost your WooCommerce store's sales with our addons, thoughtfully designed for maximum conversion and performance.
Key services
WooCommerce Quick View plugin, WooCommerce Wishlist plugin, WooCommerce Floating Cart plugin, WooCommerce Compare Products plugin
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Astra Theme, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity
Frameworks
Elementor, Astra Theme
Platforms
WooCommerce, WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics via Google Tag Manager
Marketing tools
Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional WooCommerce addon provider
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on homepage
  4. Uses modern WordPress technologies and Elementor builder
  5. Includes customer testimonials as trust signals
  6. No security.txt or incident response info found
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected
  8. Good SSL and domain security posture but DNSSEC not enabled
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress stack using Elementor page builder and Astra theme, ensuring responsive design and good SEO optimization. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity for analytics and user behavior tracking. The site loads moderate amounts of CSS and JavaScript, with jQuery as a dependency. Hosting appears to leverage Cloudflare DNS services, improving performance and security. Accessibility features are basic but present. There is room for improvement in performance optimization and security hardening, particularly in adding security headers and enabling DNSSEC. The technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively but should evolve to meet higher security and privacy standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with addonify.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review addonify.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.