Skip to main content

Security report for addf.org

Au Dela Des Frontieres · Other · France

High risk. 15 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Au Dela Des Frontieres is an organization registered in France since 2004, as confirmed by WHOIS data. The website at addf.org is currently offline or under construction, displaying only a placeholder page built with Joomla CMS. The site lacks substantive content, contact information, and any privacy or cookie policies, indicating a low level of digital maturity. Technically, the site is hosted by OVH sas and does not have HTTPS enabled or security headers configured, which presents security risks and reduces user trust. The absence of analytics or tracking technologies suggests minimal digital marketing or user engagement efforts at this time. From a security perspective, the lack of HTTPS and security policies are critical issues that need addressing to improve the site's posture and compliance with regulations such as GDPR. Overall, the website's current state limits its credibility and usability, and strategic improvements are necessary to establish a professional and secure online presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

15 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: Telnet

      Port 23 (Telnet) is publicly accessible - Telnet - Unencrypted remote access

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to Telnet using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MongoDB

      Port 27017 (MongoDB) is publicly accessible - MongoDB - NoSQL database

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MongoDB using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching addf.org

This scan found 31 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
32
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
50
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization appears to be a small entity operating in the non-profit or other sector, with no detailed business description or services listed on the website. The domain age and registrant information are consistent and transparent, supporting legitimacy. However, the lack of online presence and content limits insights into market positioning, revenue streams, or partnerships. There is no evidence of business certifications, contact channels, or customer engagement mechanisms. The current website state suggests either a redevelopment phase or low prioritization of digital channels. Strategic focus on content development, clear business messaging, and digital marketing would be beneficial to enhance visibility and stakeholder engagement.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is weak due to the absence of HTTPS, security headers, and privacy policies. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are evident. The domain registration is transparent and consistent, which is a positive trust factor. However, the lack of technical security controls on the website exposes it to potential risks such as data interception and user mistrust. There is no evidence of compliance with security frameworks or certifications. Immediate actions should include enabling HTTPS, implementing security headers, and publishing privacy and cookie policies to align with GDPR and best practices. The current minimal content and lack of forms reduce attack surface but also limit functionality.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user connections and improve trust.
  2. Implement essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  4. Add clear contact information and business details to enhance credibility and user engagement.
  5. Develop website content and improve accessibility and mobile optimization for better user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Au Dela Des Frontieres
Description
No business description available; website is under construction with placeholder content.
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Joomla
Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is currently offline or under construction with placeholder content only.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or forms available on the site.
  4. No security headers or HTTPS detected in the provided data.
  5. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with the organization.
  6. Website uses Joomla CMS and is hosted by OVH sas.
  7. No analytics, advertising, or tracking technologies detected.
  8. Content safety is rated safe with no adult or explicit content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Joomla CMS and hosted by OVH sas, a reputable hosting provider. The current HTML content is minimal and static, indicating a placeholder or offline status. No modern JavaScript frameworks or analytics tools are detected. The site lacks HTTPS and security headers, which are critical technical shortcomings. Performance is likely moderate given the minimal content, but mobile optimization and accessibility are poor due to the lack of responsive design and metadata. SEO optimization is also poor, with no meta description or keywords present. The technical debt is high, and modernization efforts should focus on security, content management, and user experience improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with addf.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review addf.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.