Skip to main content

Security report for adapterraawards.cz

Nadace Partnerství (The Environmental Partnership Foundation) · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Adapterra Awards website is operated by Nadace Partnerství, a Czech non-profit foundation focused on promoting climate change adaptation through awards, contests, and an inspirational database. The site targets experts and the general public interested in environmental adaptation measures, primarily in the Czech Republic and Austria. It offers resources such as downloadable booklets and showcases best practice projects. Technically, the site uses ASP.NET WebForms with Kentico CMS, integrates modern JavaScript libraries, and employs Google Tag Manager and Seznam tracking for analytics and marketing. The design is professional, mobile-optimized, and content-rich, supporting good user experience and SEO. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage and cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks explicit security headers and incident response contacts. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain legitimacy verification, though the presence of official partner logos and contact details supports trustworthiness. Overall, the site is a credible, well-maintained resource for climate adaptation information with room for security and compliance enhancements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching adapterraawards.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
50
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Adapterra Awards holds a niche position in the environmental non-profit sector, focusing on climate adaptation best practices in Central Europe. Its business model revolves around organizing contests and maintaining a public database to inspire sustainable solutions. The foundation collaborates with multiple partners including governmental and private sector entities, enhancing its credibility and reach. Revenue streams likely include grants and sponsorships. The target audience includes environmental professionals, municipalities, and the general public. Growth indicators include annual contests and updated publications. The partnership ecosystem is robust with recognized organizations such as Deloitte and Heidelberg Materials. Strategic observations suggest a focus on awareness and knowledge dissemination rather than commercial activities.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is implied but not explicitly confirmed in the data. Cookie consent is implemented with granular control, supporting GDPR compliance. However, no security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) were detected, which could expose the site to certain risks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The absence of incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure policies indicates room for improvement in security governance. Overall, the site maintains basic security hygiene but should enhance its security framework and transparency to better protect users and data.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and vulnerability disclosure page to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  3. Regularly update and audit third-party libraries and scripts to avoid potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Add explicit incident response contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses) to facilitate reporting and handling of security issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance with standards and user inclusivity.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Nadace Partnerství
Registration number
457 73 521
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nadace Partnerství (The Environmental Partnership Foundation)
Description
The Adapterra Awards seek functioning adaptation measures to help countries adapt to climate change. They maintain a database of best practice examples to inspire experts and the public. The site also organizes contests in Czech Republic and Austria and publishes booklets on climate adaptation topics.
Key services
Organizing adaptation contests, Maintaining inspirational adaptation database, Publishing thematic booklets, Providing information and awareness
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Splide.js, FontAwesome, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, Seznam tracking, ASP.NET WebForms
Frameworks
ASP.NET WebForms
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent with granular consent levels
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by external Google Tag Manager and favicon links)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Seznam tracking
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Seznam tracking
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about climate change adaptation awards and database.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which limits domain trust verification.
  3. Professional design and consistent branding with partner logos and social media presence.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented with GDPR compliance.
  5. No explicit security headers detected in provided data; security posture moderate.
  6. No contact phone numbers found; only email and physical address provided.
  7. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts found.
  9. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected; content safe for general audience.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on ASP.NET WebForms with Kentico CMS, leveraging jQuery, Splide.js for UI components, and FontAwesome for icons. It uses Google Fonts for typography and integrates Google Tag Manager and Seznam tracking for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and lazy loading images for performance. However, no explicit hosting provider information was found. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in accessibility and security headers. The technical stack is modern enough for current needs but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with adapterraawards.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review adapterraawards.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.