Skip to main content

Security report for ada.gov

U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division · Government · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ADA.gov is the official website of the U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division dedicated to the Americans with Disabilities Act. It serves as a comprehensive resource for individuals with disabilities, government entities, and businesses to understand their rights and responsibilities under the ADA. The site offers legal documents, guidance materials, complaint filing mechanisms, and community outreach information, positioning itself as the authoritative source on disability rights in the United States. Technically, the website is built using modern, government-standard technologies including Jekyll and the U.S. Web Design System (USWDS), ensuring accessibility and mobile responsiveness. It integrates analytics tools such as Google Analytics and the Digital Analytics Program for performance and usage tracking. The site is hosted securely with HTTPS and demonstrates excellent performance and SEO optimization. From a security perspective, ADA.gov enforces HTTPS and maintains secure forms for user input. However, it lacks explicit security headers and a publicly available security policy or incident response contact, which are areas for improvement. Privacy compliance is generally good, with a comprehensive privacy policy present, though a cookie consent mechanism is absent. Overall, ADA.gov is a highly credible and trustworthy government resource with excellent content quality and user experience. Strategic recommendations include enhancing privacy compliance with cookie consent, publishing security policies, and implementing additional security headers to strengthen its security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ada.gov

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ADA.gov operates as a government informational platform under the U.S. Department of Justice, focusing on disability rights enforcement and education. Its market position is unique as the official source for ADA-related information, providing legal and practical guidance to a broad audience including individuals with disabilities, businesses, and government agencies. The business model is non-commercial, centered on public service and regulatory compliance. The site benefits from strong trust signals such as the .gov domain, official DOJ branding, and authoritative content. Its partnership ecosystem includes related government domains and archival resources. Growth indicators include recent content updates and active community outreach. The platform's operations emphasize accessibility, legal compliance, and public engagement.

Security posture

The security maturity of ADA.gov is solid, leveraging HTTPS and secure form handling to protect user data. The absence of visible security headers and a formal security or incident response policy suggests room for maturity improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content analysis. The site does not currently provide a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file, which could enhance transparency and incident response readiness. Compliance with privacy regulations is supported by a comprehensive privacy policy, though cookie consent mechanisms are lacking. Overall, the security posture is strong for a government informational site but could benefit from adopting additional best practices to align with modern security frameworks.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a visible cookie consent banner to enhance privacy compliance and user transparency.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve defense-in-depth.
  3. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information to increase trust and preparedness.
  4. Consider creating and hosting a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to minimize potential security risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division
Description
The ADA.gov website provides information about the Americans with Disabilities Act, a law protecting people with disabilities from discrimination in many areas of public life.
Key services
Information dissemination about ADA, Guidance and resource materials, Complaint filing and processing, Community outreach and support
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Jekyll v4.3.2, USWDS (U.S. Web Design System), Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Digital Analytics Program (DAP), Touchpoints feedback widget
Frameworks
USWDS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
excellent
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure .gov domain
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with confirmation and review process

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Digital Analytics Program
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Digital Analytics Program
Marketing tools
Touchpoints feedback
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Official U.S. government ADA website with comprehensive resources.
  2. No WHOIS data available publicly, typical for .gov domains.
  3. No cookie consent banner detected, potential privacy compliance improvement area.
  4. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy.
  5. Uses modern web technologies and USWDS framework for accessibility.
  6. Includes multiple contact methods with government addresses and phone numbers.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Jekyll as its CMS and the U.S. Web Design System (USWDS) framework, ensuring compliance with federal accessibility standards. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking, along with the Digital Analytics Program for government-wide analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and fast loading times. No hosting provider details were explicitly found, but the .gov domain implies government hosting infrastructure. The technical implementation is modern and well-maintained, with opportunities to enhance security headers and privacy mechanisms. The site’s SEO and metadata are well structured, including Open Graph and JSON-LD schema for rich search results.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ada.gov. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ada.gov.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.