Skip to main content

Security report for ad.gt

Other · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

42/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The analyzed website content corresponds to a standard HTTP 404 error page served by the Chromium browser, indicating that the requested page at ad.gt cannot be found. There is no business or company information present on the page, and no privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are detected. The page includes scripts related to the Chrome offline dinosaur game, confirming it is a browser-generated error page rather than a functional business website. The domain WHOIS data is privacy protected, and no registrant details are available to verify legitimacy. Overall, the website lacks content, business presence, and compliance indicators, resulting in a low trust and credibility score.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of ad.gt. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  4. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Critical

      DNS Resolution Failed

      Unable to resolve domain A records

      What to do: Verify domain is properly configured and not expired

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ad.gt

This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
60
DNS health
25
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
42

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ad.gt, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
11
Employees
0
Customers
11
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for ad.gt.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the absence of any business-related content, contact information, or policies, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived from this domain. The domain appears inactive or misconfigured, serving only an error page. There are no indications of market positioning, services, or partnerships. The privacy-protected WHOIS further limits insights into ownership or operational status.

Security posture

The security posture is minimal and basic. The page is served over HTTPS (implied by the failed URL https://ad.gt/), but no advanced security headers or policies are present in the content. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data are detected, but the lack of security best practices and absence of security or incident response policies indicate a low maturity level. The error page itself does not leak sensitive information, which is a positive aspect.

Recommendations

  1. Configure the domain to serve a valid website or redirect to an active domain.
  2. Publish privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to comply with regulations.
  3. Add clear contact information and business details to improve trust and credibility.
  4. Implement security headers and ensure HTTPS is properly configured.
  5. Remove privacy protection or disclose registrant information if operating a legitimate business.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
This is an error page indicating that the page at ad.gt cannot be found (HTTP ERROR 404). No business or company information is present.
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, HTML5, CSS3, Canvas API, Web Audio API
Frameworks
Chromium error page scripts
Platforms
Chrome browser offline error page
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is an HTTP 404 error page indicating the page cannot be found.
  2. No privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service detected.
  3. No contact information or business details present.
  4. The page includes a Chrome offline dinosaur game script, indicating this is a browser error page.
  5. No external links except the domain itself.
  6. No analytics, advertising, or tracking scripts detected.
  7. No security headers or advanced security features detected in the content.
  8. WHOIS data is privacy protected, limiting trust assessment.
  9. No social media or marketing presence detected.
  10. Overall website quality and professionalism is poor due to lack of content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses standard Chromium error page HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, including the offline dinosaur game scripts. The technical implementation is basic and functional for an error page but lacks any CMS, analytics, or marketing technologies. The page is mobile optimized and accessible at a basic level but offers no SEO or content value. Hosting and infrastructure details are not discernible from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 42/100High25 findings · partial scanView report
  2. 42/100High25 findings · partial scanView report
  3. 42/100High25 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ad.gt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ad.gt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.