Skip to main content

Security report for activitiesindustrymutual.co.uk

Activities Industry Mutual · Other · United Kingdom

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Activities Industry Mutual (AIM) operates as a membership community dedicated to providing alternative insurance solutions specifically tailored for the activities industry. Owned by its members and governed by an elected board of outdoor adventure experts, AIM offers cost-effective liability cover and related insurance products to activity providers and organizations within this niche sector. The website reflects a focused business model with clear product offerings and a professional presentation, supported by a reputable parent company, Thomas Miller Group. Technically, the website is built on the TYPO3 CMS platform, leveraging modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager and reCAPTCHA for analytics and security. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and incorporates comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms, demonstrating a mature digital infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good SEO and accessibility practices. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms. However, it lacks visible security headers and does not publish a formal security policy or incident response contacts, which are areas for improvement. The WHOIS data is notably absent or invalid, indicating potential domain registration issues, though the website content and business information appear legitimate and professionally maintained. Overall, AIM presents a trustworthy and professional online presence with solid technical and privacy compliance foundations. The primary risk lies in the domain registration inconsistency, which should be investigated further to ensure full legitimacy and continuity. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security transparency, publishing incident response details, and clarifying domain registration status.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching activitiesindustrymutual.co.uk

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
90
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AIM occupies a niche market segment providing insurance products tailored to the activities industry, leveraging a membership-based business model. Its competitive advantage lies in specialized liability coverage and a governance structure involving industry experts, which enhances trust and relevance. Revenue streams likely derive from membership fees and insurance premiums. The target customers are activity providers and organizations requiring specialized insurance. The company benefits from association with the Thomas Miller Group, enhancing credibility and operational support. Growth indicators include active news updates and engagement via social media. The partnership ecosystem is broad within the Thomas Miller family of companies, suggesting strategic alignment and resource sharing.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforcement and use of Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated abuse. Privacy compliance is strong with a detailed cookie consent mechanism and GDPR-aligned policies. However, the absence of security headers and lack of published security or incident response policies represent gaps that could impact risk management and user trust. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The missing WHOIS data raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, which could pose operational risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate but would benefit from enhanced transparency and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Clarify and rectify domain registration status with Nominet UK to resolve WHOIS inconsistencies and ensure domain legitimacy.
  5. Enhance direct contact options by providing verified company emails and phone numbers to improve user trust and communication.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Activities Industry Mutual
Description
AIM is a membership community dedicated to the activities industry, providing cost-effective and high-quality liability cover for activity providers, individuals and organisations operating in this sector.
Key services
Liability cover, Property, Equipment & Business Interruption cover, Legal Expenses, Pharos Response, Other insurance covers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism with granular controls

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professional and relevant to the activities insurance sector.
  3. No direct company emails or phone numbers found; contact via forms only.
  4. Strong privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms implemented.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  6. WHOIS data is missing or invalid, raising some concerns about domain registration legitimacy.
  7. Use of modern CMS (TYPO3) and Google services for analytics and tag management.
  8. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Instagram.
  9. Website is mobile optimized and accessible with good SEO practices.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS, a robust and mature content management system, indicating a stable technical foundation. Integration with Google Tag Manager and reCAPTCHA reflects modern analytics and security practices. The site is mobile responsive and accessible, with good SEO metadata and structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine understanding. Performance is moderate, with compressed CSS and JavaScript assets indicating optimization efforts. No hosting provider details were discernible from the content. Technical risks include missing security headers and potential domain registration issues that could affect site availability or trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with activitiesindustrymutual.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review activitiesindustrymutual.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.