Skip to main content

Security report for actimel.pl

Actimel · Other · Poland

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and DNS health.

Security score

84/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Actimel.pl is a consumer brand website focused on the Actimel product line, targeting the Polish market. The site is built on WordPress and uses common SEO and analytics tools such as Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The domain is well established, created in 2001, and registered with a reputable registrar, indicating a legitimate and stable business presence. However, the site lacks explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages, which are important for compliance and user trust. The technical infrastructure is modern with good mobile optimization and moderate performance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and monitoring via New Relic, but could be improved by enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Unregistered MX Record

      MX record points to unregistered domain: mx.hostersi.pl

      What to do: Remove or fix MX record pointing to unregistered domain

      • RFC 5321 §5.1
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching actimel.pl

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
95
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
84

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website represents a consumer product brand with a focus on health and wellness products. The business model appears to be brand marketing and consumer engagement rather than direct e-commerce. The target audience is general consumers in Poland. The site uses standard marketing and analytics tools to track user behavior and optimize engagement. There is no explicit contact or business registration information visible, which limits direct business intelligence insights. The domain age and registration data support a mature market presence. No partnerships or subsidiaries are explicitly linked from the site content.

Security posture

The security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced and use of third-party monitoring tools like New Relic. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security robustness. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which is a gap in security transparency. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.
  3. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Add explicit contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer and security incident reporting.
  5. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve security transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Actimel
Description
Actimel
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Kadence Blocks, New Relic Browser Agent
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent via Cookiebot
  • New Relic monitoring

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, New Relic Browser Agent
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based site for Actimel brand in Poland.
  2. Uses standard SEO and analytics tools.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in the main HTML content.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  7. No explicit security headers detected in provided data.
  8. Domain is well aged and registered with a known registrar.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with a modern front-end using Kadence Blocks and optimized with Yoast SEO. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and cookie management. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets from trusted CDNs and uses New Relic for performance monitoring. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design. The site lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC, which are recommended for modern web security. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in loading speed and accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 87/100Low20 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with actimel.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review actimel.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.