Skip to main content

Security report for act-gruppen.com

ACT Logimark AS · Manufacturing · Norway

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ACT Logimark AS is a Norwegian company specializing in industrial marking, tracking, and control solutions, offering hardware, software, labels, RFID tags, and technical expertise. With over 35 years of experience, the company serves B2B clients primarily in manufacturing and logistics sectors, positioning itself as a leading provider in Norway. The website supports e-commerce functionality and provides extensive product and service information, including a service center and machine rental offerings. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and enhanced by various plugins for SEO, cookie consent, and user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS, cookie consent management, and no visible vulnerabilities, although formal security policies and incident response contacts are not published. The site integrates multiple third-party services including Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Stripe for payments, and Zendesk for support. Privacy compliance is well managed via Cookiebot with granular consent options. Overall, the website is professional, well-branded, and trustworthy, with good technical implementation and user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
63/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching act-gruppen.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
25
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
63
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets industrial clients requiring marking and tracking solutions, leveraging a B2B e-commerce model combined with service offerings. Its market position is strengthened by long-standing experience and a broad product portfolio including industrial printers, weighing and detection equipment, and software solutions. Partnerships with CRM, payment, and support service providers indicate a mature operational ecosystem. The presence of customer logos and detailed product categories suggests a focus on credibility and customer trust. Growth indicators include active content updates and seminars. The company maintains a consistent brand image and engages customers via multiple social media channels.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent management, and no exposed sensitive data. However, it lacks publicly available security policies and incident response contacts, which are important for transparency and compliance. The use of third-party scripts is extensive but managed with consent mechanisms. No critical vulnerabilities or security headers were detected in the HTML content. GDPR compliance is supported by Cookiebot, but further documentation on data protection officer and vulnerability disclosure is absent. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved with formal policies and incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Add incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ACT Logimark AS
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ACT Logimark AS
Description
ACT Logimark AS leverer hardware, software, etiketter, RFID-tags og teknisk kompetanse for merking og sporing av produkter, emballasje og lastbærere.
Key services
Hardware and software for marking and tracking, Labels, RFID tags, Technical expertise, Industrial marking solutions, Weighing and detection equipment, Label printers and accessories, LogiFlow software, Service center and machine rental
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Yoast SEO Premium, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager, jQuery, Splide Carousel, YITH WooCommerce plugins, Perfect Scrollbar, Select2, Accordion Blocks, Contact Form 7
Frameworks
GeneratePress theme, WooCommerce e-commerce framework
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL and resource URLs)
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed credentials or sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager with consent mode configured

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Ads, Facebook Pixel, Mixpanel (implied by cookies)
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc. (Facebook), Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot session tracker, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, YITH WooCommerce plugins
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional B2B e-commerce and service platform for industrial marking and tracking solutions
  2. Strong cookie consent and privacy management via Cookiebot
  3. Multiple social media and partner integrations
  4. No visible security or content blocking issues
  5. Comprehensive product and service offerings with clear navigation
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities. It employs a range of plugins for SEO (Yoast SEO Premium), cookie consent (Cookiebot), and user interface enhancements (Splide Carousel, YITH WooCommerce plugins). The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing integrations. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The technical stack is well integrated but relies heavily on third-party services, which requires ongoing management to ensure security and performance. Hosting provider details are not disclosed in the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with act-gruppen.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review act-gruppen.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.