Skip to main content

Security report for acecounter.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.home.acecounter.com appears to be a basic Wix-hosted site with minimal content and no identifiable business information. The lack of WHOIS registration data for the domain suggests it is a subdomain or unregistered domain, which raises concerns about legitimacy and trustworthiness. The site includes standard Wix scripts and third-party tracking tools such as Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager, and Channel.io, indicating some level of analytics and user engagement tracking. However, there are no privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, or contact details available, which negatively impacts privacy compliance and business credibility. Security posture is weak due to the absence of visible HTTPS or security headers in the provided data. Overall, the site lacks substantive business content and trust signals, resulting in a low risk and trust score.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching acecounter.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention acecounter.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
386
Employees
0
Customers
386
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
28%

10 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for acecounter.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the absence of business descriptions, contact information, or WHOIS registrant data, it is not possible to ascertain the market positioning, business model, or target customer segments of this website. The site seems to serve as a placeholder or informational subdomain rather than a fully operational business site. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identifiable from the content. The use of Wix platform and standard tracking tools suggests a small-scale or personal project rather than an enterprise-level operation.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is weak based on the available data. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or X-Content-Type-Options. No incident response or security policy information is present. The use of third-party analytics and chat tools introduces potential privacy risks without accompanying compliance disclosures. The absence of WHOIS data further complicates trust assessment. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content, but the lack of security best practices is notable.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user connections.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Provide clear contact information including company emails, phone numbers, and physical addresses to improve business credibility.
  4. Add security headers to protect against common web vulnerabilities and improve security posture.
  5. Consider registering the domain properly and providing accurate WHOIS information to enhance trust and legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Wix, JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Channel.io
Platforms
Wix
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Channel.io
Marketing tools
Channel.io
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Wix platform with standard Wix scripts and assets.
  2. No WHOIS registration data found for the domain www.home.acecounter.com, indicating it is likely a subdomain or unregistered domain.
  3. No privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service found on the site.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the content.
  5. Website includes tracking scripts from Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager, and Channel.io.
  6. No security headers or HTTPS status information available from provided data.
  7. Content is minimal and mostly technical scripts and styles; no meaningful business content detected.
  8. No signs of adult or explicit content; content safety rating is safe.
  9. No WAF or blocking detected; site content is accessible.
  10. Overall website quality and professionalism are basic to poor.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Wix platform, utilizing Wix's standard JavaScript libraries and assets. It integrates third-party services such as Microsoft Clarity for analytics, Google Tag Manager for tag management, and Channel.io for chat support. The site uses modern JavaScript and polyfills for browser compatibility. Performance appears moderate with asynchronous script loading, but mobile optimization and accessibility are basic. SEO optimization is minimal with no evident structured data or meta tags beyond defaults. The lack of security headers and HTTPS information is a technical risk. Overall, the technical infrastructure is typical for a small Wix site but lacks advanced security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with acecounter.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review acecounter.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.