Skip to main content

Security report for accuria.be

Accuria · Other · Belgium

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Accuria is a Belgian company founded in 2016 specializing in personalized social secretariat services, payroll, HR, training, and related tools primarily targeting small and medium-sized enterprises (KMO's) in Belgium. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant business content in Dutch. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Leadinfo, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though some security headers and explicit security policies are not published. The domain registration data is consistent with the business claims, registered through a reputable registrar since 2016. Overall, the website is trustworthy, compliant with GDPR, and provides a good user experience with moderate tracking and advertising transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  4. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching accuria.be

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
80
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Accuria operates in the business services sector, focusing on social secretariat and HR/payroll solutions tailored for Belgian SMEs. Their competitive advantage lies in a personalized approach with dedicated dossier managers and sector-specific expertise. Revenue streams likely include service contracts for payroll, HR support, training sessions, and software tools. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem, evidenced by links to sectoral agreements and related resources. Growth indicators include recent expansion with a new office in Ieper and a comprehensive offering of training and tools. The website supports lead generation through contact forms and educational content, positioning Accuria as a trusted regional player.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent mechanism that blocks non-essential scripts until consent is given. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and security headers like Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. Compliance with GDPR is evident through privacy policy and cookie management. Incident response readiness is unclear due to lack of published contacts. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by publishing formal policies and improving HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  2. Add HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Maintain transparency on data retention policies and provide users with easy access to data management options.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Accuria
Description
Dienstverlening die bij u past. Accuria kent uw sector als geen ander. Door hun jarenlange ervaring weten zij bij Accuria waar u in uw sector moet op letten.
Key services
Starten met personeel, Payroll & HR, Tools & Oplossingen, Opleidingen
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Swiper.js, WordPress
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with blocking scripts
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Leadinfo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
Leadinfo
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is in Dutch (nl-BE) targeting Belgian businesses
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy mechanisms implemented
  4. No direct email or phone contact found on homepage; contact form used
  5. Multiple legal pages present (privacy, terms)
  6. Use of modern tracking and analytics tools with consent
  7. Good SEO and structured data usage
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response info published
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using a modern tech stack including jQuery, Swiper.js for carousels, and multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Leadinfo. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile optimized with responsive design. SEO is well implemented with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. The hosting provider is linked to the registrar Combell nv, a reputable Belgian hosting and domain provider. There is no evidence of technical debt or outdated technologies, but accessibility could be improved. The site uses cookie consent scripts to comply with GDPR and blocks non-essential cookies until consent is given.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 69/100Medium25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with accuria.be. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review accuria.be.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.