Skip to main content

Security report for acconsento.click

Other · Canada

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website acconsento.click appears to be a login portal for a service named 'Acconsento'. The domain is relatively new, registered in 2020, and uses privacy protection for its WHOIS data. The site is hosted behind Cloudflare and uses Laravel as its backend framework, indicated by the presence of Laravel-specific routes and CSRF tokens. The site content is minimal, primarily a login page with no public-facing information such as privacy policies, cookie policies, or terms of service. There is no visible contact information or business description, limiting the ability to assess the business comprehensively. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries and CSS frameworks but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended for improved security posture. The SSL configuration is basic but present. No analytics or advertising scripts were detected, indicating minimal tracking or marketing activities. Overall, the site is functional but lacks transparency and compliance documentation, which may affect user trust and regulatory compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of acconsento.click. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching acconsento.click

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
65
Email security
55
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the absence of public business information, the market positioning and business model of Acconsento are unclear. The domain's registration in Canada and use of privacy protection suggest a small or startup entity. The site targets users who need to log in, possibly customers or employees, but no further details on services or sectors are available. The lack of contact details and policies limits the ability to evaluate competitive advantages or growth indicators. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the domain or content. The business intelligence is limited by the minimal public footprint.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is moderate. The presence of HTTPS and CSRF tokens indicates basic security practices. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security robustness. The domain status flags clientTransferProhibited and clientUpdateProhibited provide some protection against unauthorized domain changes. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The site lacks incident response contact information and vulnerability disclosure policies, which are important for security maturity. Overall, the site should improve its security headers and transparency to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts.
  5. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate any hidden vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML, QuillJS
Frameworks
Ziggy (JavaScript routing helper for Laravel)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • CSRF token present in meta tag
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited and clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a login page with no public content or policies visible.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or business details publicly available.
  4. Uses Laravel backend framework with Ziggy routing helper.
  5. Hosted behind Cloudflare with DNSSEC not enabled.
  6. No analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  7. No security headers detected in provided data.
  8. Domain registration is privacy protected with no public registrant info.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a Laravel backend framework with Ziggy JavaScript routing, indicating a modern PHP-based infrastructure. The frontend includes QuillJS for rich text editing and Google Fonts for typography. Hosting is via Cloudflare DNS, providing CDN and DDoS protection. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements. Performance is moderate given the use of external resources and standard CSS/JS frameworks. No CMS is detected. The lack of SEO metadata and policies limits discoverability and compliance. Technical debt appears low but the absence of security headers and DNSSEC are notable risks. Modernization opportunities include adding security best practices and compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 70/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with acconsento.click. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review acconsento.click.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.