Skip to main content

Security report for accessibilite.lu

Le Gouvernement du Grand-Duché du Luxembourg · Government · Luxembourg

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website accessibilite.lu is an official government portal of Luxembourg dedicated to providing information on accessibility across digital platforms, infrastructure, and products/services. It serves as a public service resource aimed at residents and stakeholders interested in accessibility issues within Luxembourg. The site is branded consistently with Luxembourg government identity and offers navigation in French with an option for German. Technically, the site uses standard HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript, including Adobe Launch for analytics, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, though content quality is basic with limited depth on the landing page. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS implied, but lacks visible security headers and formal security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies or consent mechanisms. No contact or incident response information is provided, limiting user engagement and trust channels. Overall, the domain registration and DNS configuration align with official Luxembourg government infrastructure, confirming legitimacy and trustworthiness. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance, security headers, and contact transparency would enhance the site's security and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching accessibilite.lu

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions itself as a government entity providing essential accessibility information, targeting residents and stakeholders in Luxembourg. Its competitive advantage lies in official status and authoritative content. The business model is public service dissemination without commercial intent. Revenue streams are not applicable. The partnership ecosystem includes related Luxembourg government subdomains focused on specific accessibility areas. Growth indicators are limited by the static nature of government informational sites. The site’s operations reflect a focus on compliance with accessibility standards and public awareness. The lack of detailed business or contact information suggests a primarily informational role rather than transactional or service-oriented.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The site uses HTTPS (implied by domain and external links) and employs Adobe Launch for analytics, but lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. No forms or user inputs reduce attack surface, but absence of published security policies or incident response contacts limits transparency and readiness. GDPR compliance indicators are weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The security culture appears basic, focused on informational delivery rather than interactive services. Enhancements in security headers, privacy disclosures, and incident response mechanisms are recommended to improve posture.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add clear contact information and incident response channels for security reporting.
  4. Ensure SSL/TLS configuration is strong and regularly audited.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to foster transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Le Gouvernement du Grand-Duché du Luxembourg
Description
Government website providing information and resources about accessibility in Luxembourg, covering digital accessibility, infrastructure accessibility, and accessibility of products and services.
Key services
Accessibilité Numérique, Accessibilité Infrastructure, Accessibilité des Produits et Services
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, Adobe Launch (Adobe DTM)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS implied by domain but not confirmed in provided data
  • No forms or inputs detected to expose vulnerabilities

Analytics and tracking

Services
Adobe Launch
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Adobe Launch
Marketing tools
Adobe Launch
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a government informational portal focused on accessibility in Luxembourg.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the page.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the HTML content.
  4. No forms or data collection mechanisms detected.
  5. Use of Adobe Launch for analytics/tracking is present but no explicit cookie consent mechanism found.
  6. Content is in French with language switch option to German.
  7. Site uses official government logos and branding.
  8. No security headers or explicit security policies detected in provided data.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  10. External links point to related official Luxembourg government accessibility subdomains.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a straightforward technology stack with HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript, including Adobe Launch for analytics. The site is mobile optimized and accessible with a responsive design. Performance is moderate, with no explicit CMS or hosting provider identified. The absence of complex frameworks or CMS reduces technical debt but limits dynamic content capabilities. SEO optimization is basic with minimal meta tags and no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The site could benefit from enhanced metadata, improved performance optimization, and adoption of modern web frameworks or CMS for scalability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with accessibilite.lu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review accessibilite.lu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.