Skip to main content

Security report for abpromote.dk

Other · Denmark

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.abpromote.dk is accessible and presents a professional design with good navigation and mobile optimization. It uses modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery, FontAwesome, and integrates Cookiebot for cookie consent management and hCaptcha for bot protection. The site employs Google Analytics for traffic analysis, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the absence of visible privacy policy and terms of service pages, as well as lack of explicit contact information, limits its privacy compliance and business credibility. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which reduces trust in domain legitimacy and transparency. Security posture is moderate with cookie consent and bot protection in place but lacks advanced security headers and visible SSL configuration details. Overall, the site is functional and moderately secure but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching abpromote.dk

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business behind www.abpromote.dk appears to be a small entity based in Denmark, targeting local or regional audiences. The website title is generic ('Home') and no explicit business description or services are found in the provided content, limiting detailed business intelligence. The use of cookie consent and analytics tools suggests awareness of regulatory requirements and marketing needs. The absence of company contact details and registration information suggests a need for improved business transparency. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the content. The business model and market position cannot be conclusively determined from the available data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. It uses HTTPS (implied by the URL) and includes a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR principles. The integration of hCaptcha indicates proactive bot mitigation. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS are detected, which are recommended best practices. The lack of visible privacy policy and incident response contacts is a compliance gap. WHOIS data absence reduces domain trustworthiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Overall, the site is moderately secure but requires improvements in security headers, transparency, and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the website footer or main navigation.
  2. Implement and verify security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Ensure WHOIS domain registration details are complete and publicly available to improve trustworthiness.
  4. Add clear company contact information including email, phone, and physical address to enhance business credibility.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to avoid vulnerabilities and ensure compliance with privacy regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Cookiebot, hCaptcha, YouTube iframe API, FontAwesome
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Use of hCaptcha for bot protection

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms
  2. Cookie consent banner is implemented with detailed cookie categories
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in the provided content
  4. No explicit contact information or business registration details found
  5. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and external resources
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust assessment
  7. No visible security headers or advanced security configurations detected
  8. Google Analytics used for traffic analysis
  9. No visible certifications or security policies published
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and FontAwesome, and integrates third-party services including Cookiebot for cookie management and hCaptcha for bot protection. The site loads fonts and stylesheets from external CDNs, which may impact performance depending on network conditions. The HTML structure is valid with responsive design considerations. SEO optimization is basic with canonical tags and Open Graph metadata present but lacks structured data like JSON-LD for enhanced search presence. Accessibility features are basic, with some focus indication and ARIA roles used in the cookie consent dialog. Hosting provider and CMS are not identifiable from the content. Performance is moderate, with deferred script loading and preloading of fonts and stylesheets.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with abpromote.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review abpromote.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.