Skip to main content

Security report for aboutpoliticalads.org

Digital Advertising Alliance · Government · United States

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AboutPoliticalAds.org is a government-affiliated informational website operated by the Digital Advertising Alliance, providing tools and resources for voters to research political candidates and advertisers associated with online political ads. The site offers a searchable map linking to election and campaign databases across U.S. states and territories, enhancing transparency and accountability in political advertising. The target audience primarily includes U.S. citizens interested in political ad transparency and voter resources. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 7 CMS and employs standard web technologies including jQuery, Google Analytics with IP anonymization, and font services like Google Fonts and Typekit. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with a moderate performance profile. However, it lacks some modern security headers and explicit cookie consent mechanisms. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration and anonymizes IP addresses in analytics. There are no detected vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of security headers and a vulnerability disclosure policy indicates room for improvement in security posture and compliance. Privacy policy exists but is basic and does not explicitly address GDPR compliance. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional, serving an important role in political ad transparency. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance, security headers, and incident response readiness would enhance its security and compliance posture, further strengthening user trust.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of aboutpoliticalads.org. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aboutpoliticalads.org

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
53
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Digital Advertising Alliance operates AboutPoliticalAds.org as a non-profit/governmental resource focused on political advertising transparency. The business model centers on providing public access to political campaign data and advertiser information to promote accountability. The site leverages partnerships with official entities like the Federal Election Commission and YourAdChoices to enhance credibility. Revenue streams are likely grant or government funded, with no direct commercial transactions observed. The target customers are voters and citizens seeking transparency in political advertising. The organization maintains a consistent brand and content quality, positioning itself as a trusted resource in the political transparency ecosystem. Growth potential lies in expanding database coverage and enhancing user engagement through improved technical and security features.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and Google Analytics configured for IP anonymization. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present, limiting transparency in security incident handling. Privacy policy is basic and does not explicitly cover GDPR or other data protection regulations, indicating compliance gaps. Incident response contact information is absent, which may delay reporting and mitigation of security issues. Overall, the security culture appears functional but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced technical controls to meet higher compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve browser security.
  2. Add a clear cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Enhance the privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR, CCPA, and data retention practices.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Provide explicit incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Digital Advertising Alliance
Description
The Political Ads Program provides tools for citizens to research registered political candidates and advertisers who are associated with an online political ad—and keep them accountable.
Key services
Searchable map of election & campaign databases, Information about political ad advertisers, Links to Federal Election Commission data, Complaint reporting for political ads
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, FontAwesome, Google Fonts, Typekit Fonts
Frameworks
Drupal 7
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google Analytics IP anonymization enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a government/non-profit informational resource focused on political ad transparency.
  2. Content is accessible and well-structured with a focus on voter resources.
  3. No signs of blocking or WAF interference.
  4. Uses Drupal 7 CMS with standard web technologies.
  5. Privacy and terms pages are present but privacy policy is basic and lacks explicit GDPR compliance statements.
  6. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected.
  7. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via a form.
  8. Google Analytics is used with IP anonymization enabled.
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  10. No security headers detected in the HTML content; potential area for improvement.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 7, a mature but aging CMS platform, using jQuery and standard web fonts. It integrates Google Analytics with IP anonymization for user tracking. The site is mobile responsive and accessible with good navigation and content structure. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. However, the absence of modern security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates technical debt in security and privacy compliance. The site could benefit from modernization efforts including upgrading the CMS, implementing security best practices, and enhancing privacy controls to reduce risk and improve user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 49/100High38 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aboutpoliticalads.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aboutpoliticalads.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.