Skip to main content

Security report for abmi-engineering.com

ABMI Engineering · Manufacturing · France

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ABMI Engineering is a well-established French engineering company founded in 2002, specializing in multiple industrial sectors including nuclear, rail, aerospace, health, and manufacturing. The company offers a broad range of engineering services such as design, industrialization, supply chain management, robotics, and IoT solutions. Their market position is supported by a diversified sector presence and partnerships with major industry players. Technically, the website is built on a modern Next.js framework, optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though improvements can be made by enabling DNSSEC and publishing explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is strong with clear privacy and cookie policies and GDPR adherence. Overall, the website projects a professional and trustworthy image with strong business credibility and technical maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching abmi-engineering.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention abmi-engineering.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1,221
Employees
0
Customers
1,221
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
9%

9 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for abmi-engineering.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ABMI Engineering operates primarily in the manufacturing and industrial engineering sectors, targeting B2B clients such as project owners, manufacturers, and specialized industrial companies. Their business model focuses on providing engineering solutions across diverse sectors, supported by a subsidiary specializing in IoT product design (Rtone). The company demonstrates growth and market penetration through international branches and a career portal, indicating ongoing expansion. Their partnership ecosystem includes major clients like RATP, Michelin, EDF, and Airbus, which enhances their competitive advantage. The website content and structure reflect a strategic focus on quality, innovation, and sector diversification.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data. However, there is no explicit security policy or incident response contact information published, which could be a gap in transparency and readiness. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file limits external security collaboration. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended improvement for DNS security. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be enhanced by adopting more comprehensive security communication and DNS protections.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact details on the website.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  4. Add and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Maintain regular security audits and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ABMI Engineering
Description
ABMI Engineering is a specialist engineering company working across 8 different business sectors offering a wide range of solutions to meet customer needs. They provide services in nuclear, rail, aerospace, health, land/industrial vehicles, capital and consumer goods, chemical/oil & gas, and environment and renewables sectors.
Key services
Design and industrialization, Supply, quality and industrial performance, Infrastructure and general installation, Robotics specialized machines implementations, IoT, data, cybersecurity, cloud solutions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, JavaScript, CSS, Alice Carousel, Swiper.js
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries
  • Secure forms (contact forms) with no visible issues

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
tree-nation.com tracking scripts
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is comprehensive and relevant to engineering sectors.
  3. Strong presence of trust indicators including certifications and client logos.
  4. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  5. Good privacy and cookie policy implementation.
  6. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  7. No terms of service page found.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  9. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and business continuity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Next.js, a modern React-based framework, ensuring good performance and SEO optimization. The use of modern JavaScript libraries like Swiper.js and Alice Carousel enhances user experience. Hosting is provided by OVH sas, a reputable provider. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with fast loading times and structured navigation. There is no CMS detected, indicating a custom-built solution which can offer better control but requires dedicated maintenance. The technical stack is modern and well-implemented, with opportunities to improve security headers and DNS configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with abmi-engineering.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review abmi-engineering.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.