Skip to main content

Security report for abimovel.com

ABIMÓVEL - Associação Brasileira das Indústrias do Mobiliário · Manufacturing · Brazil

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ABIMÓVEL is a Brazilian industry association focused on representing and supporting the furniture manufacturing sector. The organization promotes export initiatives, sustainability programs, design integration, and regulatory compliance education to enhance the competitiveness of its members. The website serves as a portal for industry news, projects, and resources, targeting furniture manufacturers, designers, and exporters primarily in Brazil but with international outreach. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Elementor and various Jet plugins, hosted on Locaweb infrastructure. However, the site lacks a valid SSL certificate and modern TLS support, which undermines its security posture. There are no visible privacy or cookie policies, and no formal security or incident response policies are published. Social media presence and contact forms indicate active engagement and data collection, but privacy compliance appears minimal. Overall, the site is professionally designed but requires significant security and compliance improvements to meet modern standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching abimovel.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The association holds a strong position in the Brazilian furniture manufacturing sector, leveraging partnerships with ApexBrasil and other entities to promote internationalization and sustainability. Its business model centers on advocacy, education, and export promotion, with key programs like Brazilian Furniture and SIMB. The target audience includes manufacturers, designers, and exporters seeking market expansion and regulatory guidance. The website content reflects ongoing projects, events, and industry news, indicating active sector engagement. The partnership ecosystem and project portfolio suggest a medium-sized organization with a focus on growth and competitiveness in global markets.

Security posture

The current security posture is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of TLS protocol support, exposing users to potential interception and data integrity risks. Security headers are minimal, and no advanced protections like HSTS or OCSP stapling are implemented. The site does not publish a security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure information, indicating low maturity in security governance. Data collection via contact forms and analytics is present but without visible privacy or cookie consent mechanisms, raising compliance concerns under GDPR and similar regulations. The overall risk includes potential data exposure, lack of user trust signals, and regulatory non-compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS and secure user data.
  2. Implement modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or 1.3) and disable insecure legacy protocols.
  3. Add and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  4. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with preload and includeSubDomains options.
  5. Publish clear privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies with GDPR compliance details.
  6. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
  7. Create and publish a security policy and incident response contact information.
  8. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and publish a security.txt file.
  9. Review and enhance data protection officer contact visibility and data retention policies.
  10. Improve website accessibility and SEO optimization for broader reach and compliance.
Technical notes

Notes

The website runs on a WordPress CMS with PHP 7.4.33 and nginx 1.22.1 web server, using Elementor page builder and multiple Jet plugins for enhanced UI and functionality. It integrates Bootstrap and FontAwesome for styling and icons, and jQuery for scripting. Hosting and mail services are provided by Locaweb, as indicated by DNS records. Performance metrics are not available, but the site appears to have moderate load characteristics. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and language selectors. However, the lack of SSL/TLS and security headers represents a critical technical debt. The site uses Google Analytics for tracking, but privacy controls are minimal. Overall, the infrastructure is standard for a medium-sized WordPress site but requires modernization and security hardening to reduce operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with abimovel.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review abimovel.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.