Skip to main content

Security report for abbaye-blanche-couronne.fr

Abbaye de Blanche-Couronne · Government · France

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Abbey of Blanche-Couronne website serves as an official digital presence for a heritage site managed by the Department of Loire-Atlantique in France. It provides comprehensive information about the abbey, visiting options, departmental cultural actions, and links to other related heritage sites. The site targets tourists, heritage enthusiasts, and the general public interested in regional culture. The business model is government/non-profit focused on cultural preservation and tourism promotion. Technically, the website is built on the Jalios JCMS platform, leveraging modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking, and Orejime for cookie consent management. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and demonstrates good SEO practices. Performance is moderate with a professional design and clear navigation. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR. However, it lacks a publicly available security policy or incident response contact information, which are recommended for enhanced transparency and trust. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional, with a high level of content quality and compliance. The absence of WHOIS data slightly reduces domain trust verification but does not detract from the site's legitimacy given its official departmental affiliation and consistent branding.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching abbaye-blanche-couronne.fr

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
55
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions the Abbey of Blanche-Couronne as a key cultural heritage site within the Loire-Atlantique department. It benefits from governmental support and is part of a network of related heritage sites, enhancing its market presence. The business model focuses on cultural tourism and public education, with no direct commercial transactions. The site’s partnership ecosystem includes multiple official heritage and cultural institutions, reinforcing its credibility and reach. Growth indicators include active social media engagement and regular content updates. The site’s operations align with public sector standards and regional cultural promotion strategies.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. The use of Orejime for cookie management and Google Tag Manager for analytics is standard practice. However, the absence of a published security policy and incident response contacts represents a compliance gap. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information is present, which could improve transparency and incident handling readiness. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified, indicating a low risk of immediate security threats.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information to facilitate reporting of security issues.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to enhance transparency.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party libraries and tracking tools to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance WHOIS data availability or transparency to improve domain trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Abbaye de Blanche-Couronne
Description
The website represents the Abbey of Blanche-Couronne, a heritage site managed by the Department of Loire-Atlantique, France. It provides information about the abbey, visiting details, departmental actions, and related heritage sites.
Key services
Heritage site information, Visitor information, Departmental cultural actions, Links to related heritage sites
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Jalios JCMS, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Orejime cookie manager, Swiper carousel
Frameworks
Jalios JCMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented with clear navigation and good mobile support.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented in compliance with GDPR.
  4. WHOIS data is unavailable, which limits domain trust verification.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  6. Social media presence on Instagram and LinkedIn supports legitimacy.
  7. Multiple external links to official heritage and government sites.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Jalios JCMS, a specialized content management system for institutional and cultural sites. It uses modern JavaScript libraries and integrates Google Tag Manager and Analytics for user tracking. The site is mobile responsive and accessible, with good SEO metadata including Open Graph and Twitter cards. Performance is moderate, with external CSS and JS loaded from trusted domains. Cookie consent is managed via Orejime, a recognized consent management tool. No deprecated or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML source. The site lacks explicit hosting provider information but appears professionally maintained.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with abbaye-blanche-couronne.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review abbaye-blanche-couronne.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.