Skip to main content

Security report for ab-inbev.com

Anheuser-Busch InBev · Manufacturing · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Anheuser-Busch InBev is the world's largest brewer, with a heritage spanning over 600 years. The company operates globally, producing and distributing more than 500 iconic beer brands. Their website reflects a mature enterprise with a strong focus on responsible drinking, sustainability, and investor relations. The digital infrastructure leverages modern technologies such as SvelteKit and Builder.io CMS, ensuring a responsive and accessible user experience. Security posture is robust with HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and an age verification gate to comply with legal drinking age requirements. Privacy compliance is good, with clear privacy and cookie policies, though explicit cookie consent mechanisms could be improved. Overall, the website projects high business credibility and professionalism.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ab-inbev.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ab-inbev.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
10,736
Employees
521
Customers
3,432
Third parties
6,783
Weak passwords
10%

Latest record dated 2026-06-18 · 156 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for ab-inbev.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –globalsso.ab-inbev.com2026-06-18
  • –onedesktop-eu.ab-inbev.com2026-06-18
  • –globalsso.ab-inbev.com2026-06-17
  • –globalsso.ab-inbev.com2026-06-17
  • –globalsso.ab-inbev.com2026-06-15

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AB InBev holds a dominant market position in the global brewing industry, targeting a broad mature audience. Their business model centers on manufacturing, brand management, and global distribution. The website supports investor relations, sustainability initiatives, and career opportunities, indicating a well-rounded corporate strategy. The presence of a responsible disclosure policy and sustainability programs suggests a commitment to corporate governance and social responsibility. The company maintains active social media channels to engage with customers and stakeholders. No suspicious or fraudulent indicators were found, supporting a high legitimacy score.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS, multiple security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The age verification gate enforces compliance with alcohol regulations. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy page and incident response contact information represents an area for improvement. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and Builder.io personalization requires ongoing monitoring to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security maturity is high, supporting business continuity and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement an explicit cookie consent banner to enhance GDPR compliance.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and controls.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
  4. Add data protection officer contact information to improve transparency.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Anheuser-Busch Companies LLC
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Anheuser-Busch InBev
Description
Anheuser-Busch InBev, the world's largest brewer. We're Dreaming Big For a Future With More Cheers.
Key services
Beer brewing, Brand management, Global beverage distribution
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
SvelteKit, Font Awesome, Google Tag Manager, Builder.io
Frameworks
SvelteKit
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Age verification gate for alcohol content
  • Responsible disclosure policy linked
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Builder.io pixel
Marketing tools
Builder.io personalization and A/B testing
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Comprehensive corporate website for a global brewing company
  2. Strong focus on responsible drinking and sustainability
  3. Multiple sections for investors, careers, news, and brand information
  4. Use of modern web technologies and CMS
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including SvelteKit and Builder.io CMS, enabling dynamic content and personalization. It uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. Hosting is provided via Incapsula (Imperva), indicating enterprise-grade protection and performance. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices evident from meta tags and structured content. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in media delivery and script loading. The technical stack supports scalability and maintainability, though continuous monitoring of third-party integrations is advised to mitigate security risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 66/100Medium20 findingsView report
  2. 75/100Medium9 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ab-inbev.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ab-inbev.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.