Skip to main content

Security report for 7x.cz

Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 7x.cz is a newly created WordPress blog with minimal content, primarily hosting a default 'Hello world!' post dated August 24, 2025. The site appears to be in early stages of development or testing, with no substantive business information, contact details, or policies published. The technical infrastructure is based on WordPress CMS, hosted by REG-GRANSY, and uses Google Analytics with consent mode configured to deny all tracking for EU regions, indicating some awareness of privacy compliance. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies, terms of service, and contact information limits the site's credibility and compliance posture. Technically, the site uses modern fonts and scripts, is mobile optimized, and loads with moderate performance. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but lacks security headers and explicit security policies. No forms or data collection mechanisms are present, reducing immediate risk but also limiting user engagement. The WHOIS data is consistent with the website content and domain age, showing no suspicious registration patterns. Overall, the site is safe with no adult or questionable content detected. The primary risks relate to lack of privacy and security documentation and absence of business transparency. Strategic recommendations include adding comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, publishing contact and incident response information, implementing security headers, and enhancing content quality to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 7x.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
65
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

7x.cz currently functions as a basic WordPress blog without clear business operations or market positioning. The lack of business descriptions, services, or contact details suggests it is either a personal or test site rather than a commercial entity. The domain is registered recently with a Czech registrar, aligning with the Czech country code top-level domain. There are no indications of partnerships, subsidiaries, or revenue streams. The site targets a general audience with blog content but lacks strategic business intelligence data to assess competitive advantages or growth potential.

Security posture

The security posture of 7x.cz is minimal but adequate for its current state. HTTPS is enforced, and Google Consent Mode is configured to deny tracking in EU regions, reflecting some privacy awareness. However, the site lacks security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy information is published, and no forms or user input fields are present to evaluate input validation or secure data handling. The site does not appear to be behind a WAF or security challenge, and no vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the security maturity is low but acceptable given the site's limited scope.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add contact information including security incident response contacts such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Configure security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common attacks.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Develop richer content and business information to improve credibility and user engagement.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
A WordPress blog site with minimal content, currently hosting a default 'Hello world!' post.
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Google Analytics, Google Site Kit, Manrope font, Fira Code font
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google Consent Mode with all ad and analytics storage denied by default for EU regions

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Site Kit
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a minimal WordPress blog with default content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or business details provided.
  4. Uses Google Analytics with consent mode denying all tracking for EU regions.
  5. No security headers detected in HTML content.
  6. No forms or data collection fields present.
  7. No social media or external business links found except Google services.
  8. Website is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with the Twenty Twenty-Five theme, hosted by REG-GRANSY. It uses Google Analytics via Google Site Kit with consent mode configured to deny all tracking for EU countries, indicating privacy-conscious setup. Fonts used include Manrope and Fira Code loaded locally from the theme assets. The site is mobile optimized and accessible with good semantic HTML structure. Performance is moderate with no obvious errors or broken elements. No advanced frameworks beyond WordPress core scripts are detected. The site lacks security headers and explicit SEO metadata beyond basic title and RSS feeds. Overall, the technical implementation is standard for a basic WordPress blog but could benefit from enhanced security and SEO optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 7x.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 7x.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.